The appellant could hardly claim to have been misled by a Board ...

Appellant's Claim of Misleading Circular Rejected; Finance Act, 1994 Clearly Defines Service Tax Liability.

January 21, 2014

Case Laws Service Tax AT

The appellant could hardly claim to have been misled by a Board Circular issued in respect of a wholly distinct service and drawing generic jural principles from such circulars. Had the appellant gone through the provisions of the Finance Act, 1994, there would be no occasion for a doubt as to its liability to service tax - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

The appellant could hardly claim to have been misled by a Board ...

Appellant's Claim of Misleading Circular Rejected; Finance Act, 1994 Clearly Defines Service Tax Liability.

January 21, 2014

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Refund claim rejected by adjudicating authority on grounds that services provided by appellant to SOLCIL did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST...

The Appellant challenged the admission of the Section 7 application filed by the Financial Creditor, contending no debt was due as the application was premature. The...

Claim of appellant rejected on the ground that Resolution Plan has been approved by the CoC - right to claim consideration of claim again in third round - NOIDA’s status...

Initiation of CIRP process - application was rejected on the ground that the claim of the Appellant falls within the ambit of disputed claim - Merely disputing a claim...

Appellants filed claims after the cut-off date for submission of claims in the insolvency resolution process. The approved resolution plan kept such delayed claims alive...

Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by original authority on grounds of ineligibility for exemption notification. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded...

Approval of Resolution Plan - The Adjudicating Authority has not taken cognizance of the award and rejected the application filed by the Appellant. Since the Appellants...

The appellant's claim for Rs. 9.21 crores, arising from the termination of an agreement due to non-renewal of a performance bank guarantee, was not considered by the...

Refund claim for unutilised cenvat credit - appellant took re-credit of the rejected amount of refund - the subordinate legislation is effective or in force till the...

Effective date of clarificatory circular under GST - The Circular dated 06.07.2022 is clarificatory in nature whereby paragraph 3.2 of the Circular dated 31.03.2020 has...

Rejection of claims which are delayed - When an Application under Section 7 cannot be entertained for a debt, which is barred by time and is liable to be rejected, any...

Admission of claims by Liquidator - Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 are not getting any double benefit on the other hand they are loosing part of the claim even after admission...

NCLAT upheld rejection of appellant's belated claim for interest payments in liquidation proceedings. Appellant failed to file claims within prescribed timeline and...

CIRP - Seeking a direction to admit the claim of the Appellant as Financial Creditor - The Tribunal found that the possession of the units had indeed been handed over to...

Rejection of refund claim - eligible exemption - In the facts of the present case, there are no clear averments made by the appellant that conditions prescribed under...

Quick Updates: