An orders that confirms the demands, interest and imposes ...

Central Excise

February 4, 2014

An orders that confirms the demands, interest and imposes penalties on all appellants on a ground different than the allegations made in the show cause notice, is unsustainable and is liable to be set aside - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

An orders that confirms the demands, interest and imposes ...

Central Excise

February 4, 2014

You may also like:

Reversal of Credit availed but not utilized - penalty waived but demand of interest confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

Levy of penalty - Applicability of ration of decision made in the case of co-noticee - in absence of the appeal by revenue against this order the order has acquired...

Validity of demand of GST - For assessment year 2017-2018 - Notice in Form ASMT-10 issued for discrepancies found in returns - proceedings initiated pursuant to notice...

Levy of penalty upon the Director of appellant’s company and upon Head of Finance and Accounts of the appellants’ company and upon the company itself - The SCN is held...

Excess utilisation of cenvat credit - Whether the appellant is liable to pay interest and penalty on account of alleged excess utilisation of cenvat credit - The demand...

Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty...

Interest liability - delay in furnishing GSTR-3B return - Liability imposed without any adjudication proceeding u/s 73 or 74 - despite disputing the liability towards...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

Liability of interest on demand of duty - since the appellant were a sick company, the interest liability cannot be imposed on the appellant. - AT

Since the penalties imposed under Section 76 is upheld, penalties imposed under Section 78 cannot be justified, Hence the penalties imposed u/s 78 is set aside - In the...

Levy of penalty under the wrong provisions of the act - proposes imposition of penalty u/s 114, 114A and 114AA of the Customs Act. Order-in-original has been passed...

Even though the demand was confirmed for the extended period which was accepted by the appellant that alone is not the reason for imposing penalty u/s 11AC. Penalty u/s...

Benefit of reduced penalty of 15% u/s 28(5) - Delay in payment of penalty due to Public Holiday - The appellant voluntarily paid the differential BCD and interest upon...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is...

Quick Updates: