An orders that confirms the demands, interest and imposes ...

Court Sets Aside Order Imposing Penalties on Appellants Due to Different Grounds Than Alleged in Notice.

February 4, 2014

Case Laws Central Excise AT

An orders that confirms the demands, interest and imposes penalties on all appellants on a ground different than the allegations made in the show cause notice, is unsustainable and is liable to be set aside - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

An orders that confirms the demands, interest and imposes ...

Court Sets Aside Order Imposing Penalties on Appellants Due to Different Grounds Than Alleged in Notice.

February 4, 2014

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Benefit of reduced penalty of 15% u/s 28(5) - Delay in payment of penalty due to Public Holiday - The appellant voluntarily paid the differential BCD and interest upon...

Evidences indicate appellant was aware of smuggling activities involving diversion of smuggled cigarettes concealed in transit container, providing transportation and...

Invocation of extended period of limitation. - The Appellant had been providing same services as was alleged in the earlier Show Cause Notice dated 22.05.2015 which was...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

The High Court considered the legality of a penalty imposed u/s 31(3) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, due to the want of Form 28B. The issue was whether the defendants...

Appellant, a proprietary firm, was levied penalty for involvement in illegality by not receiving goods and receiving invoices only with intention to avail CENVAT credit...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The appellant contended that the addition made by the Assessing Officer was based solely on estimations, making it ineligible for...

The Delhi High Court addressed the cancellation of GST registration due to an alleged excess claim of Input Tax Credit. The court found that the order was based solely...

The High Court quashed the impugned show cause notice for service tax demand exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/- due to the department's failure to conduct mandatory pre-notice...

The Appellate Court exceeded its jurisdiction u/s 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by setting aside an arbitral award that had already been confirmed...

HC condoned 142-day delay in filing GST appeal where appellant demonstrated reasonable cause due to belated service of demand notice. While notice was uploaded on GST...

The High Court addressed the issue of jurisdiction in a case involving the issuance of two show cause notices to an individual for different entities. The petitioner...

HC held that the Assessing Officer (AO) erroneously issued notices under Section 148 by aggregating alleged escaped income across multiple financial years 2016-17,...

Quick Updates: