TPA - The use of word ‘shall’ in sub-section (13) shows that it ...

Assessing Officer Must Follow Dispute Resolution Panel Directions for Final Assessment Order Per Sub-section (13.

February 27, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

TPA - The use of word ‘shall’ in sub-section (13) shows that it is mandatory on the part of Assessing Officer to pass the final assessment order by only implementing the directions of the DRP- AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

TPA - The use of word ‘shall’ in sub-section (13) shows that it ...

Assessing Officer Must Follow Dispute Resolution Panel Directions for Final Assessment Order Per Sub-section (13.

February 27, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Final assessment order passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 144C(13) subsequent to Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP)/Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) directions deemed invalid...

The ITAT held that the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) lacks jurisdiction to direct the Transfer Pricing Officer or Assessing Officer in second-round proceedings after...

The Tribunal held that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was barred by limitation and quashed it. As per Section 144C(13) read with Section 143(3),...

The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) considered Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments related to foreign exchange gains and engineering services. The assessee used Transactional...

Power of DRP to enhance the assessment u/s 144C(5) - The Dispute Resolution Panel being an Expert Panel, is bound to ascertain the correctness or otherwise of the Draft...

Transfer pricing officer (TPO) erred by considering non-associated enterprise (non-AE) revenue and costs while computing transfer pricing (TP) adjustment, contrary to...

Income–tax (Dispute Resolution Panel) (First Amendment) Rules, 2018

Dispute Resolution Panel - Reference to - Reconstitution of DRP at Mumbai - 1 - Order-Instruction

The High Court ruled on the validity of an order passed u/s 144C(3) read with Section 144B. The petitioner had filed objections to the Draft Assessment Order before the...

Validity of the final assessment order due to non-service of the Dispute Resolution Panel’s (DRP) directions - AR candidly admitted before the Tribunal that, on the...

Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s 68 - The Assessing Officer has taken a possible view. When the Assessing Officer follows the direction of the Ld. Pr. CIT, in his order...

The case involves the validity of a final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 144(C)(3) beyond the period of limitation. The Dispute Resolution...

The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order. Despite the alleged violation of statutory procedure u/s 144B, the Tribunal found that the assessment...

Faceless assessment regime introduced new procedures codified u/s 144B for assessments u/ss 143(3), 144, and 147, while assessments u/s 144C (transfer pricing cases)...

The assessment order passed u/s 144C(3) was beyond the prescribed period of one month from the end of the month in which the period for filing objections u/s 144C(2)...

Quick Updates: