Penalty for aid and abetment in Mis-declaration on CHA – there ...

Customs

April 18, 2014

Penalty for aid and abetment in Mis-declaration on CHA – there is error in holding the appellant CHA as a party in the alleged mis-declaration, there being no case of aiding or abetting made out against the appellant - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty for aid and abetment in Mis-declaration on CHA – there ...

Customs

April 18, 2014

You may also like:

Import of consignment of consumer goods and household items from UAE - Mis declaration of goods - appellant is only an employee of the CHA firm - penalty reduced taking...

Cancellation of CHA License - there is no corroborative evidence or statement of anybody that the CHA had information, knowledge or has connived in the alleged forgery...

Levy of penalty on CHA - allegation of abetting some unscrupulous exporters - mens rea - The CHA are merely but processing agent on documents of clearance of goods...

Imposition of penalty on Director of the company - mis-declaration of goods - It is anybody’s guess that the CHA will not be benefited in any manner by this...

Levy of penalty on courier company - charge of abetment - mis-declaration of goods - Different standards have been followed by the Original Authority in examining the...

Penalty u/s 114(ii) - CHA is not guilty of aiding and abetting. - the CHA had the authorisation which it appears was not produced due to clerical error, but the fact has...

Imposition of penalty - Mis-declaration of imported goods - Smuggling - penalty cannot be imposed both on the proprietor as well as the firm.

When there is mis-declaration of goods, show cause notice can be issued within a period of five years from the date of findng mis-declaration by the investigating authority - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is...

Imposition of penalty on CHA - Import of prohibited goods - After finding that the appellant has become unknowingly party to fraudulent import, the imposition of penalty...

Quick Updates: