Event management service - assessee on their own are organizing ...

Cricket Tournament Organized Independently; No Evidence of Co-Sponsor Influence; Demand Set Aside by Authorities.

June 2, 2014

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Event management service - assessee on their own are organizing the cricket tournament - there is no evidence on record to show that the respondents organized the tournaments at the request of the co-sponsors or franchisees- demand set aside - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Event management service - assessee on their own are organizing ...

Cricket Tournament Organized Independently; No Evidence of Co-Sponsor Influence; Demand Set Aside by Authorities.

June 2, 2014

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

The AAR ruled that organizing physical/offline games or tournaments of contract bridge played for money does not constitute supply of 'specified actionable claims' u/s...

CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant cricket franchise, setting aside multiple service tax demands. The Tribunal determined that Central Rights Income from BCCI-IPL...

Key issues regarding invocation of time limitation for raising demand, levy of penalty, exemption from service tax for bundled services related to the game of cricket,...

Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

Franchise service or Business Support services - demand of service tax on Central Rights Income - Revenue Sharing - BCCI is not commercial organization and only...

Exemption u/s 11 - Assessment of trust - The activity of organizing the shivir which is in the nature of seminar, conference and lectures on the education and therefore,...

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the Appellant is entitled to benefit u/s Rule 6(3A) of CCR, 2004 even if the option wasn't initially exercised. Service tax on logistic...

Valuation - third party inspection charges cannot be included in transaction value - Supreme Court held cost of transportation from place of removal to delivery excluded...

Demand of duty - receipt of inputs or not - demand based on statements of the suppliers of the inputs - cross-examination not allowed - Revenue has no other evidence -...

Scope of show cause notice - demand was raised under the category of BAS - demand was confirmed under the different category - Demand set aside in toto - AT

SCN was issued to demand under the category of Transport of goods by air service - demand was confirmed under the category of Cargo handling service - demand set aside - AT

Demand without issue of show cause notice - Telephone services - Demand of differential tax u/s 73 - Best Judgement Assessment u/s 72 - demand set aside - AT

Quick Updates: