Confirmation of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) of the Act – Furnishing of ...

Penalty u/s 158BFA(2) Confirmed but Not Levied Due to Estimation-Based Additions in Income Tax Case.

June 30, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Confirmation of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) of the Act – Furnishing of inaccurate particulars - U additons have been upheld on estimation basis , thus, no penalty is leviable - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Confirmation of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) of the Act – Furnishing of ...

Penalty u/s 158BFA(2) Confirmed but Not Levied Due to Estimation-Based Additions in Income Tax Case.

June 30, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Levy of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - penalty has been levied on the amount of undisclosed income without providing any working of maximum and minimum penalty leviable - No penalty - AT

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

Disallowance made u/s 43B regarding expenses claimed by the assessee. There was confusion about which limb penalty is to be levied. The disallowance confirmed by the...

Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - estimation of disallowance at 50% of commission and improvement expenditure - in this case, the additions were made on the basis of...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Offence u/s 276(C)(2) and 277 - Allegation of willful tax evasion and non-payment of admitted tax - compounding application. The petitioner submitted income tax return...

Validity of the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) or 158BFA - AO has levied the penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act by observing that the assessee has concealed/furnished...

The appellant trust claimed to be formed for public charitable activities and registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act 1959, regularly filing its income tax...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

The ITAT Ahmedabad addressed the jurisdiction of the AO over a corporate assessee with income exceeding Rs. 30 Lakhs in metro cities. The tribunal confirmed that income,...

The ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal, directing deletion of several additions and modifications to income calculations. Key outcomes include: (1) commission...

The crux pertains to levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income regarding capital gains computation on sale...

Estimation of business income - The learned CIT (A) confirmed addition merely harping on non-compliance by assessee before the Assessing Officer and not applying his...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) involved an addition based on estimation by the Assessing Officer, which was later re-estimated by the CIT(A) to disallow 10% of the...

Quick Updates: