CIT is justified in holding the payment on net present value as ...

CIT Can Classify Net Present Value Payments for Afforestation by Mining Lessees as Revenue Expenditure.

August 5, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

CIT is justified in holding the payment on net present value as afforestation charges in respect of the mining lessees already obtained has been decided and is treated as revenue expenditure - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

CIT is justified in holding the payment on net present value as ...

CIT Can Classify Net Present Value Payments for Afforestation by Mining Lessees as Revenue Expenditure.

August 5, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision allowing deduction of Finance Lease Rental Payments under section 37(1) as revenue expenditure. Revenue's appeal challenging depreciation...

Excess premium charged on issue of shares u/s.56(2)(viib) - The value adopted by the Assessing Officer under net asset value method even though a prescribed method does...

CESTAT determined that screening and grading of iron ore constitutes mining services under MMDRA Act, 1957. The tribunal classified the appellant's services as mining...

Classification of services - to be classified under GTA services or under mining services? - deployment of loaders, excavators, dozers for removal of overburden, waste...

The case revolves around the rejection of the declared value by customs authorities and the subsequent enhancement of value based on a quotation obtained from a...

The appellant made payments of Net Present Value (NPV) to the Compensatory Afforestation Fund (CAMPA Fund) as a constitutional mandate under Article 48 of the...

The appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the demand for service tax on amounts paid by the appellants to the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) and National...

Levy of penalty on additions of admitted amount during assessment proceedings - CIT(A) deleted the penalty - Company has already liquidated - when the respondent company...

CIT(A) allowed assessee to withdraw appeal against section 263 revision order, stating Tribunal quashed section 263 order and CIT(A) erred in not deciding appeal merits....

The Appellate Tribunal addressed undisclosed sales and net profit determination. The CIT(A) limited the addition to the net profit element, with the Revenue arguing for...

Valuation of export goods - Iron Ore Fines - transaction value - FOB price - Export duty - The appellant contested this, arguing that unless the Revenue disputes the...

The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the CIT(A)'s order deleting the cash addition in the assessee company's hands. The ITAT held that the assessee acted...

The ITAT Jodhpur allowed admission of additional evidence u/r 46A of IT Rules by CIT(A) to delete addition on merits. The tribunal found merit in the evidence provided...

Mandatory penalty u/s 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 not imposed - imported goods as “Polyester Bed Sheet”- mis-classified the impugned goods - The case involves a...

Revision u/s 263 - For the purpose of exercising jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act, the conclusion that the order of the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of...

Quick Updates: