Exemption under Notification No.21/2002-CUs dated 01/03/2002 - ...

Appellant Granted Benefit Under Serial No. 216 Despite Not Claiming Exemption Due to Undisputed End Use of Goods.

November 26, 2014

Case Laws Customs AT

Exemption under Notification No.21/2002-CUs dated 01/03/2002 - Since the end use not in dispute, the appellant would be entitled the benefit of Serial No. 216 even though they have not specifically claimed the exemption. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Exemption under Notification No.21/2002-CUs dated 01/03/2002 - ...

Appellant Granted Benefit Under Serial No. 216 Despite Not Claiming Exemption Due to Undisputed End Use of Goods.

November 26, 2014

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Validity of Curtailing and whittling down the benefits with retrospective benefit - Musical Instruments - Tax exemption is a concession. Thus, exemption from payment of...

Providing Services to SEZ unit - Benefit of exemption - The appellant couldn't submit Form A1 due to unavailability to SEZ units but submitted Form A2. The revenue...

Recovery of service tax with interest and penalty - entitlement to the benefit of the VCES Scheme -Despite directions from the Commissioner (Appeals) to produce...

Re-import of goods - Claim of exemption from customs duty - Whether the original export was under the claim of refund of IGST? - Appellant claimed that at the time of...

Benefit of exemption from customs duty - Import of Microphone for Cellular Mobile Phone - even the appellant does not claim the benefit under a particular Notification...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Refund claim rejected by adjudicating authority on grounds that services provided by appellant to SOLCIL did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST...

The appellant's claim for Rs. 9.21 crores, arising from the termination of an agreement due to non-renewal of a performance bank guarantee, was not considered by the...

CESTAT held that appellant was entitled to benefit under N/N. 94/96-Cus for imported goods that were initially exported and returned. While the adjudicating authority...

Manufacture of patta and patti - Compounded levy - Appellant failed to succeed on its claim of SSI exemption benefit, due to unregistered status and due to dubious...

Exemption u/s 11 - The Assessee did not claim benefit of exemption u/s.11 of the Act before the AO and the AO did not have the benefit of examining such a claim. Mere...

The case before CESTAT Bangalore involved a refund claim seeking the benefit of a Notification under the Indo-Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement. The issue was whether the...

Exemption from countervailing duty [CVD] - there is no manner of doubt that it is only w.e.f. 26.07.2016 that parts of articles of jewellery have been included in the...

Rejection of refund claim - eligible exemption - In the facts of the present case, there are no clear averments made by the appellant that conditions prescribed under...

Assessment u/s 153A - benefit of exemption u/s 11 - Bogus purchases - even if the benefits of section 11 is denied than too there can be no income of the appellant trust...

Quick Updates: