Scope of section 73 for setting off - A single transaction may ...

Income Tax

December 23, 2014

Scope of section 73 for setting off - A single transaction may constitute a speculative business so as to be treated differently from other business under section 28 - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Scope of section 73 for setting off - A single transaction may ...

Income Tax

December 23, 2014

You may also like:

Trading on MCX - Speculative loss - set off against the business income - section 43(5)(c) - the transactions in nature of jobbing not to be treated as speculative...

Addition u/s 43(5) - Loss in commodity derivatives trading business was non-speculative - Reading clause (e) of the first proviso to section 43(5), and sections 70(1)...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - set off of the brought forward "non-speculative business loss" against the "profit of speculative business" - provisions of section 72 and 73,...

Loss on commodity transactions is a normal business loss and allowed to be set off against the speculative income - AT

Speculative transactions - set off of the loss - transaction in derivatives on recognized stock exchange as defined under Section 43 (5) (d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961...

When the speculative transactions were covered under sec.43(5) of the Act and the loss incurred in those transactions was liable to treated as speculative loss and not...

Set off of loss - speculation loss or not - loss (on account of sale of derivatives) would be allowed to be set off against income arising out of proper business because...

Treatment of Losses as Speculative Losses - adjustment of loss under arbitrage transactions - The loss of one segment has to be allowed to be set-off against the other...

Addition made towards profit in money market operations - in this case the physical delivery has not taken place and therefore the transactions of sale and purchase of...

Assessee has rightly claimed short term capital loss which is eligible to be set off against long term capital gain and the impugned transaction is neither “sham” nor...

Quick Updates: