Penalty under section 271(1)(c ) - where the complete chain of ...

Income Tax

January 19, 2015

Penalty under section 271(1)(c ) - where the complete chain of transactions had been established by the investigating authority and it has been established that the assessee was a professional entry provider and addition having been made in the hands of the assessee thus, attract the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty under section 271(1)(c ) - where the complete chain of ...

Income Tax

January 19, 2015

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the fact that assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars for the purpose of determining the tax u/s 115JB stands established - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - price charged by the assessee in international transactions have not been computed in accordance with the provisions contained in section 92C -...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - credit worthiness and genuineness of the transaction - Gifts by family friends – the explanation given by the assessee is totally false -...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - for such lump-sum disallowance out of wages on the basis of presumption, no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is leviable - AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – mere admission of appeal by the High Court is sufficient to debar the penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act - AT

Penalty being 300% by invoking Section 271(1)(c) - return was revised before completion of assessment - Revenue is not justified in imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim of deduction under Section 35CCA - penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was rightly imposed - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mandation of specification of charge - It is clear that for the AO to assume jurisdiction u/s 271(1)(c), proper notice is necessary and the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Tribunal proceeded on hyper- technicalities and acted as though every seizure must entail initiation of proceedings u/s 271 of the Act - no penalty - HC

Quick Updates: