Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2015 Year 2015 This

When the statements and records relied upon by the revenue are ...


Revenue Authorities Need Concrete Evidence Beyond Statements for Clandestine Removal Claims; Insufficient Records Not Enough.

February 17, 2015

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

When the statements and records relied upon by the revenue are not considered to be sufficient ground for clandestine removal, in that case merely on the basis of statements authenticating the said records cannot be a ground to allege clandestine removal. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Clandestine removal - evasion of duty - clearance of branded Khaini - burden to prove on Revenue - Ultimately, the High court concurred with the majority view of the...

  2. The case pertains to the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of structural items/rolled products by the appellant. The revenue's case rested solely on...

  3. Clandestine removal of excisable goods alleged based on statements recorded from partners, employees, and buyers. Section 9D of Central Excise Act mandates...

  4. Clandestine removal - The standard of evidences need not be as high as in criminal proceedings, where the charges are required to be established beyond reasonable doubts....

  5. 100% EOU - Clandestine removal - case of the department is on the ground that deemed export clearance were not genuine and were shown only on paper - The entire case of...

  6. Clandestine removal of goods - assumption / presumption - demand based on the statement - charge of clandestine removal is not sustainable in the absence of any...

  7. Central Excise demands cannot be sustained solely based on confessional statements without corroborative documentary evidence. Retracted affidavits cannot be relied upon...

  8. Clandestine Removal - reliance on private records - It is settled legal position that charge of clandestine clearance is a serious charge and the onus to prove the same...

  9. Clandestine removal - Whether electricity consumption can be considered as valid evidence of clandestine manufacture of taxable goods? - CESTAT upheld the findings of...

  10. CESTAT upheld duty and penalty demand against manufacturer for clandestine goods removal. The tribunal found substantial evidence through private records, managing...

  11. In this CESTAT decision, the Tribunal allowed the appeal against allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal of MS ingots. The Tribunal found multiple procedural...

  12. The need for clarity and concrete reasons in the cancellation of GST registrations.

  13. The appellant challenged the demand of customs duty and penalties imposed on the grounds of alleged clandestine clearance of short found goods from their factory...

  14. The CESTAT set aside the demand and penalties imposed on the grounds of alleged clandestine removal, holding that the charge was not substantiated by sufficient evidence....

  15. Clandestine removal - job-work - even if there is an oral evidence in the form of a statement, it requires to be corroborated by documentary evidence - there are no such...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates