Imposition of penalty - The mens rea is not required to be ...

VAT and Sales Tax

March 25, 2015

Imposition of penalty - The mens rea is not required to be proved as necessary ingredient for imposition of penalty under sub-section (5) of Section 78, on proving violation of sub-section(2) of Section 78 of the RST Act, 1994 - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty - The mens rea is not required to be ...

VAT and Sales Tax

March 25, 2015

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 53 - Karnataka VAT - Once statutory contravention is established, then section 53(12) is attracted which provides for levy of penalty - presence of Mens Rea...

CENVAT Credit availed wrongly on Capital goods - there is no sufficient evidence to prove Mens rea or guilt on the part of the assessee - no penalty - HC

Penalty u/s 116 – There was no requirement of proving mens rea on the part of person-in-charge of conveyance - CGOVT

If there is no mens rea, no mandatory penalty u/s 11AC - SC

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(2) of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 - men-rea - The Court concluded that mens rea is indeed an essential prerequisite for imposing a penalty under...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Default by assessee - mens rea is not an essential element for imposing penalty for non compliance of notices issued by AO - penalty confirmed - AT

Levy of penalty - mens rea in evasion of tax - It is well settled that by merely using the expression “mens rea”, it would not amount to concluding that there was a...

Levy of penalty on Director u/r 26 of CER - involvement of the director of the appellants in clandestine activities or not - here are not much reasoning has been...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The considerations for imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act are however entirely different. It requires existence of mens rea...

Levy of penalty - there is no mens rea or any premediated thought in non-complying with the statutory requirements, as no duty was actually payable upon import, being...

Quick Updates: