Wrong section quoted while claiming deduction u/s 54 - merely ...

Income Tax

May 4, 2015

Wrong section quoted while claiming deduction u/s 54 - merely because the assessee had made a claim under a wrong section instead of the correct section, the same, should not be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction otherwise allowable to the assessee. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Wrong section quoted while claiming deduction u/s 54 - merely ...

Income Tax

May 4, 2015

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - not entitled for the deduction U/s 54 - claim deduction allowed U/s 54F - once, the assessee has explained the reasons for making a wrong claim...

Deduction claimed u/s 54F OR 54 - Investment of LTCG - Owning more than one house property - CIT(A) deleted the addition considering the same u/s 54 - Assessee revised...

Nature of income on sale of flat – Exemption u/s 54 claimed - income is in the nature of business, therefore, the deduction u/s 54 not applicable - AT

Claim of deduction u/s 54 of the Act - Two flats acquired under different agreements though single kitchen and used as one single unit - exemption allowed - HC

Long term capital gain - exemption / deduction u/s 54 - Alternate claim out of two investment in residential properties - AT

Modification in the Bill of entry - assessee used a wrong expression "re-assessment of Bill of Entries" and did not quote the provision of law - This cannot be taken...

Eligibility of deduction u/s 54 and 54F - in return deduction claimed u/s 54F - in assessment proceedings revised his claim u/s 54 - AO is duty bound to allow deduction...

Attachment of property of petitioner - merely because of the wrong quoting of the provision, the order impugned before the Writ Court cannot be successfully assailed by...

Deduction claimed u/s 54 - There being no pre–condition u/s 54(1) providing for investment of the long term capital gain in purchase of new house for claiming deduction...

Suppression of turn over - the fact a wrong provision has been quoted, by itself, will not invalidate the proceedings conclude against the petitioner (assessee) - HC

Quick Updates: