Refund - since the amount in question was deposited in ...

Customs

May 12, 2015

Refund - since the amount in question was deposited in compliance with the interim order passed by the High Court of Bombay, which was not towards duty, the question of unjust enrichment would not arise at all. - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - since the amount in question was deposited in ...

Customs

May 12, 2015

You may also like:

Question of Refund of amount deposited during pendency of appeal as per the direction and when appeal was dismissed as not maintainable - TNVAT - amount to be refunded - HC

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - amount deposited during investigation - and amount of pre-deposit - Refund allowed - AT

Recovery of penalty against the company/ partnership firm - Cenvat Credit - Application seeking to vacate the interim relief - There is no good reason to vacate the...

Refund of pre-deposit - ITAT on 21.10.2014 passed remand order - the authorities were required to pass fresh assessment by 31.03.2017 - But, order was not passed by that...

Dishonor of Cheque - permission to deposit interim compensation - the trial Court committed an error without passing any order directing the respondent/accused to...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Security deposit - amount not to be credited to consumer welfare fund - appellants are eligible for refund of cash security...

Refund claim rejected as time bared - the amount deposited by the appellant during the investigation can never be construed as a duty - it is held as deposited under...

Refund of amount of tax deposited by the petitioner - Detention of vehicle alongwith the goods - Once demand has been raised against the petitioner after passing of the...

Refund of amount collected without authority of law including TDS - Sharing of revenue between two States - the amount paid by the petitioner pursuant to the interim...

Recovery of Refund - The original orders passed by the adjudicating authority in sanctioning the refunds in favour of the appellants were not challenged by Revenue...

Quick Updates: