Refund - since the amount in question was deposited in ...

High Court of Bombay Clarifies: Deposit Not Related to Duty Payments, Unjust Enrichment Rule Not Applicable.

May 12, 2015

Case Laws Customs SC

Refund - since the amount in question was deposited in compliance with the interim order passed by the High Court of Bombay, which was not towards duty, the question of unjust enrichment would not arise at all. - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - since the amount in question was deposited in ...

High Court of Bombay Clarifies: Deposit Not Related to Duty Payments, Unjust Enrichment Rule Not Applicable.

May 12, 2015

Case Laws Customs SC

You may also like:

Interest on pre-deposit - payment of duty after reversal of duty debited in DEPB scrips is pre-deposit OR duty payment - there cannot be any duty at all when the issue...

The case involved the issue of pre-deposit during the pendency of appeal, applicability of Section 11B and unjust enrichment, and eligibility for interest on refund of...

The appellant is entitled to refund of the amount deposited 'under protest' during the pendency of adjudication proceedings and investigation, as it cannot be considered...

Refund claim of excess duty paid - unjust enrichment - after issuance of corrigendum the excess duty, paid lacks the colour of duty and is merely a deposit - the excess...

CESTAT ruled that in provisional assessment cases, adjustments of excess duty payments against shortfalls must be handled comprehensively. The tribunal determined that...

Seeking refund of deposit - the amount is deposit or duty? - refund of security deposit during provisional assessment - Since in view of the documentary evidence, it is...

Various doubts related to treatment of sales promotion scheme under GST clarified

Pre deposit made by VODAFONE shall not be subject to the doctrine of unjust enrichment

Refund of Service Tax paid - unjust enrichment - any amount deposited during the pendency of adjudication or investigation is in the nature of a deposit and, therefore,...

The High Court held that petitioners are entitled to pay 10% of the disputed GST amount as a pre-condition for filing an appeal by debiting the amount available in the...

Recovery of erroneous refund - amount paid by the appellant’s Chennai Unit towards the pre-deposit in connection with an appeal filed arising out of order in Tuticorin...

HC rejected Petitioner's application for unconditional tax demand stay, affirming the requirement to deposit 20% of the contested tax amount. The court found the deposit...

The case pertains to the interpretation of amended provisions of Sections 35F and 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding eligibility for interest on pre-deposit...

Short payment of duty due to wrong availment of Excess Cenvat Credit - Payment of duty in Cash - default mentioned under Rule 8(3A) is applicable in short payment of...

Liability to pay customs duty when confiscated goods are redeemed after payment of fine u/s 125 of the Customs Act, 1962 includes liability to pay interest on delayed...

Quick Updates: