Penalty u/s 112 - import made in the name of other firm - Merely ...

Customs

June 2, 2015

Penalty u/s 112 - import made in the name of other firm - Merely IEC holder lending the IEC to a third party is not an offence under the Customs Act and penalty for violation of Section 7 of Foreign Trade Development and Regulation Act 1992 cannot be imposed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 112 - import made in the name of other firm - Merely ...

Customs

June 2, 2015

You may also like:

Levy of penalty of IEC code holder and middleman - Allowing third party to use its IEC code - Bonafide Belief - Misdeclaration of imported goods by third party - There...

Levy of penalty for lending of the IEC - Smuggling of prohibited goods from India - export of incense raw materials - Levy of penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty u/s 112 - since penalty has been imposed on partnership firm under Section 112 (a), separate penalty on its partner would not be justified - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 112 (a) and 112 (b) of the Customs Act, 1962 - import by misdeclaration of description and value of the consignments using the IEC registered in the...

Revocation of Customs Broker license - As per the Commissioner, the appellant has not brought to the knowledge of the Department that IEC holders have lent their IECs to...

Levy of penalty - use of IEC code of others for import of goods - penalty under two different provisions of law is leviable. - AT

Penalty u/s 112(b) of Customs Act – allegation that he was using an imported bike which could not have been established as legally imported into India - stay granted - AT

Confiscation - penalty - import of lead acid rechargeable batteries - import in the name of others IEC number - If the foreign supplier or Kolkata Customs officials had...

Levy of penalty on Customs Broker u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - It was alleged that the appellant dealt with unauthorized person instead of dealing with the...

Penalty u/s 112(a) and 114AA of CA - import of High end cars / Sports Utility Vehicles - appellant admitted that the value of the imported goods had been mis-declared...

Quick Updates: