Reopening of assessment - reasons for assessment reopened are ...

Income Tax

June 3, 2015

Reopening of assessment - reasons for assessment reopened are identical to the objections of the audit party - A.O. has reopened the assessment without any application of mind and accordingly the reopening is not sustainable in law - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reopening of assessment - reasons for assessment reopened are ...

Income Tax

June 3, 2015

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reopening based on audit objections - reasons to believe - High Court observed that, reopening an assessment beyond four years requires...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 148 - Participation in the assessment proceedings after rejection of objections by the AO, without challenging the order of...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reopening on the basis of the audit objections - the reasons for reopening of the assessment are almost identically worded as that of...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reason to believe - The court scrutinized the purported tangible material for reopening, which consisted of audit...

Reopening of Assessment - if the reason on which the assessment is reopened fails, the AO can not proceed to assess some other income - HC

Challenging reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 - the basis of the order is completely different from the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment which is...

Reopening u/s 147 - non disposing objections by AO before proceeding with the assessment by passing a speaking order - The re-assessment cannot be sustained

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - non disposal of the objections by the AO by passing speaking order - sufficient to quash re-assessment order

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reply to the audit objections - in fact AO applied his mind to the audit party objection and formed a clear opinion that there is no...

Reopening of assessment - A bare glance of the reasons recorded gives an impression that the reopening has been carried out on shallow reasonings which is not sustainable in law.

Quick Updates: