Charges of oppression and mismanagement - the petitioners have ...

Petitioners accuse company of oppression and mismanagement, seek cancellation of 2010-2011 returns; delay in filing questioned.

June 24, 2015

Case Laws Companies Law Board

Charges of oppression and mismanagement - the petitioners have sought cancellation of various Returns filed by the Company with the Registrar of Companies in the year 2010 and 2011. This petition came to be filed on 18/07/2014. However, the Petitioners have not offered any sound and convincing reason as to why they approached the CLB after such inordinate lapse of time. - CLB

View Source

← Previous Next →

Charges of oppression and mismanagement - the petitioners have ...

Petitioners accuse company of oppression and mismanagement, seek cancellation of 2010-2011 returns; delay in filing questioned.

June 24, 2015

Case Laws Companies Law Board

You may also like:

Petitioner paid Rs. 8,46,84,821/- under Settlement Scheme for 2010-2011, against which Respondents recovered Rs. 19,16,74,501/-, resulting in excess collection of Rs....

Oppression and Mismanagement - Transfer of Shares - allotment of shares - Forum Shopping - It is clear that even as on 1998, there was no business conducted by the...

Oppression and mismanagement - Removal of Director - Period of limitation - Time gap of 5 years - The petition filed by the petitioner is prima facie barred by...

Oppression and mismanagement - Determination of minimum shareholding for filing complain / petition against the company - The ‘onus’, to establish ‘Membership’ is on the...

The petition alleges oppression and mismanagement by the company's majority shareholders against the petitioners, who were removed as directors through an Extraordinary...

The crux of the matter revolves around allegations of oppression, mismanagement, illegal sale of company land, allotment of equity shares, appointment and removal of...

Oppression and mismanagement - removal of the Petitioner from the Directorship - the instant Company Petition is maintainable U/s.241 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the...

Mintainability of a company petition u/s 399 of the Companies Act, 1956, focusing on the pre-conditions envisaged under sub-sections (1) and (3). It examines whether the...

Cancellation/withdrawal of registration/approval u/s 12AA/10(23C)(vi) with retrospective effect - The AO while completing the assessment for AY 2010-11 after search...

The High Court held that the Assessing Officer had credible reasons to reopen the assessment u/s 147 for the Assessment Year 2011-12. During the search and seizure...

Seeks to amend notification no. 119/2010-Customs, dated 19th November, 2010 so as to revoke anti dumping duty on subject goods originating in or exported from Saudi...

Oppression and Mismanagement - illegal allotment of shares - the allegations that there has been an illegal allotment of Petitioner's shares, exclusion of Petitioner...

Dishonor of cheque case. Petitioners described as managers, wives of directors. Court examined whether petitioners can be arrayed as accused. Held, company is principal...

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF - Companies Bill, 2011 and Companies Bill, 2012

Tri dismissed the petition alleging oppression and mismanagement under Sections 397 & 398 of Companies Act, 1956. The tribunal found the petitioner suppressed...

Quick Updates: