Tri dismissed the petition alleging oppression and mismanagement ...

Corporate Dispute Dismissed: Petitioner Fails to Prove Mismanagement Claims Due to Suppressed Material Facts and Lack of Evidence

May 5, 2025

Case Laws Companies Law Tri

Tri dismissed the petition alleging oppression and mismanagement under Sections 397 & 398 of Companies Act, 1956. The tribunal found the petitioner suppressed material facts about initial company formation and land acquisition agreements. Documentary evidence demonstrated the petitioner was part of an original group agreement with equal capital participation. The petitioner failed to substantiate claims of misappropriation and was deemed to have approached the tribunal without clean hands. The tribunal emphasized that party conduct is crucial in equitable proceedings, ultimately rejecting the petitioner's allegations as vague and unsupported by sufficient evidence.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Tri dismissed the petition alleging oppression and mismanagement ...

Corporate Dispute Dismissed: Petitioner Fails to Prove Mismanagement Claims Due to Suppressed Material Facts and Lack of Evidence

May 5, 2025

Case Laws Companies Law Tri

You may also like:

Initiation of CIRP - existence of debt and pre-existing dispute or not - When no action is initiated in respect of the said mismanagement, projecting the mismanagement...

CIRP - Rejection of Section 9 Application on the ground of pre-existing dispute - The dispute stemmed from services provided by the Operational Creditor to the Corporate...

Initiation of CIRP - Mere allegation without any supporting evidence would not help the Corporate Debtor - As far as the loan taken by the applicant is concerned the...

NCLAT analyzed the maintainability of a Section 9 application for gratuity claims by workmen against a corporate debtor. The Tribunal held that gratuity claims...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Petitioners seeking initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate...

Wages/salaries of the workmen/employees during the CIRP period - There are disputed questions, whether in fact the IRP/RP managed the operations of the corporate debtor...

Rejection of the simultaneous claim by the Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor - Claim filed by the Applicant with respect to the corporate guarantee given...

The petition alleges oppression and mismanagement by the company's majority shareholders against the petitioners, who were removed as directors through an Extraordinary...

Maintainability of application under I&B Code - pre-existing dispute or not - It is clear that the claim means a right to payment even if it is disputed. Therefore,...

Initiation of CIRP - - Merely because the 'Corporate Debtor' has disputed the claim by showing that there is certain counter claim, it cannot be held that there is...

NCLAT allowed the appeal and set aside Section 9 proceedings under IBC against the Corporate Debtor. The tribunal found a pre-existing dispute between parties involving...

The NCLAT held that the corporate debtor failed to substantiate a pre-existing dispute with the operational creditor regarding the unpaid operational debt. The corporate...

Maintainability of application u/s 9 of IBC, 2016 for non-payment of dues arising from supply of manpower services hinges on existence of pre-existing dispute between...

NCLAT reversed the admission of Section 9 application under IBC, finding the existence of a genuine dispute regarding operational debt. The tribunal determined that...

The Appellate Tribunal affirmed the decision to exclude the Appellant and other unsecured Financial Creditors from the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The key issues were...

Quick Updates: