Revision u/s 263 - The order passed by CIT is illegal without ...

Income Tax

July 2, 2015

Revision u/s 263 - The order passed by CIT is illegal without jurisdiction on these issues. - if such type of order is sustained then this will permit the illegality to continue and the subsequent actions carried out on the illegal order are also illegal. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - The order passed by CIT is illegal without ...

Income Tax

July 2, 2015

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - CIT(A) does not have any jurisdiction over those issues which have not been considered by the AO. - AT

Recovery of tax - The notices issued to the petitioner were wholly without jurisdiction and clearly indicate exercise of unauthorised and illegal power by the Tax...

Revision u/s 263 - Deduction u/s 80IC - Since, AO had not expressed any view in that behalf as is discernible from the assessment order, revision order sustained.

Revision u/s 263 - scope of limited scrutiny - PCIT has directed the AO to pass the assessment order afresh ignoring that when the case is selected for limited scrutiny,...

Revision u/s 263 - As the assessment was completed after making required amount of enquiry and there was no lake of enquiry or investigation by the AO on the issues...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - AO framed assessment order on died company - in the absence of a valid notice, the AO has no authority to assume the jurisdiction to assess the...

Revision u/s 263 - AO was bound to follow the direction given by the Tribunal while passing order in u/s 143(3) r.w.s 254 and not permitted to deal with any other issue...

Collection of penalty without order - Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - collection of penalty without an order u/s Section 53(12)(c), is illegal and can hardly be...

Revision u/s 263 - violation of the provisions of section 40A(3) - CIT is not justified in invoking jurisdiction u/s 263 on the strength of an audit note - AT

Assessment u/s 153A – Invocation of power of revision u/s 263 - Commissioner did not have jurisdiction to initiate any proceedings u/s 263 - HC

Quick Updates: