Rectification of Mistake – AO granted the exemption from sales ...

Tribunal Erred: Sales Tax Exemption Exceeded Allowed Limit, Mistake Not Seen as Apparent on Record by Authorities.

August 19, 2015

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Rectification of Mistake – AO granted the exemption from sales tax wrongly beyond the prescribed limit - Tribunal and authorities have committed manifest error of law to hold that mistake as sought to be rectified by the revenue, was not mistake apparent on record - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rectification of Mistake – AO granted the exemption from sales ...

Tribunal Erred: Sales Tax Exemption Exceeded Allowed Limit, Mistake Not Seen as Apparent on Record by Authorities.

August 19, 2015

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

The Tribunal held that in a case involving a requisition u/s 132A of the Act, the jurisdiction to complete the assessment is governed by the provisions of Section 153A....

The appellant contested the service tax demand on trade discounts and incentives received from Tata Motors Limited for promoting or marketing vehicles. The Tribunal held...

The case involved the scope of limited scrutiny and the validity of a notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny to...

Exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - Threshold limit of Rs. 1 Crore - The Appellate Tribunal found that the appellant's gross receipts, when considering certain fee receipts...

Rectification u/s mistake u/s 254 - apparent mistake in the order of Tribunal warranting rectification - scope of section 254(2) is limited to rectification of mistake...

The ITAT adjudicated a capital gains tax exemption claim under Section 54, reversing lower authorities' decisions. The tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to...

Tribunal apparently fell into an error in not rectifying the said mistake apparent on the face of record, which is nothing more than a mistake of fact and even if it is...

The Appellate Tribunal considered whether the assessee, a trust registered u/s 12AA, qualified for exemption u/s 11 as a charitable entity. The AO argued the trust's...

The case involves disputes u/s CST Act and KVAT Rules. The High Court addressed issues including whether a time gap exceeding 100 days between transit end and buyer...

Rectification of mistake - mistake apparent on the face of record or not - rectification of an order stems from the fundamental principle that justice is above all and...

The case pertains to the scope of limited scrutiny by the assessing officer regarding computation of capital gains u/s 45 and providing exemption u/s 54B of the Income...

Rectification of mistake - Refusal to exercise the jurisdiction under Section 31 of the U.P. V.A.T. Act, 2008 - Section 31 of the U.P. V.A.T. Act, 2008, does not impose...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the revision u/s 263 of the Act regarding the allowability of deduction of interest claimed u/s 57. The Tribunal held...

Rectification of mistake - mistake apparent of the face of record or not - The Tribunal in its original order dated 10th December 2018 have dealt with this decision and...

Exemption u/s 11 was not claimed in original return due to auditor's mistake in Form No. 10B. Assessee rectified mistake by filing revised Form No. 10B. Statutory claim...

Quick Updates: