SSI Exemption - Use of brand name - significance of evidence - ...

Court Rules Sales Document Insufficient for SSI Exemption in Central Excise Case Involving Maharaja Brand Mixer-Grinders.

September 5, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise HC

SSI Exemption - Use of brand name - significance of evidence - In the absence of any evidence except the single document, which had no description of the goods, the said document purporting to be a sales statement cannot be treated as containing the figures of sale of Maharaja brand mixer-grinders manufactured and cleared - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

SSI Exemption - Use of brand name - significance of evidence - ...

Court Rules Sales Document Insufficient for SSI Exemption in Central Excise Case Involving Maharaja Brand Mixer-Grinders.

September 5, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

SSI Exemption - value of clearances - clubbing of clearances - The tribunal found the appellants engaged in the manufacture and sale of excisable goods without Central...

Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

Method of Valuation - prototype vehicles - goods cleared from the factory on payment of duty under self invoice on the comparable value of the similar vehicle applying...

Software - Exemption scheme under service tax modified – exemption under central excise and customs withdrawn

The court held that the revenue authorities cannot question the decision of the Development Commissioner regarding bunching of products for domestic tariff area (DTA)...

Levy and collection of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED), Road and Infrastructure Cess (RIC), and Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC) on removal...

Confiscation of land, buildings etc. - invocation of powers under Rule 173(Q)(2) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 on 26.03.2007 and 29.03.2007 for confiscation of land,...

Vires of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - At least four different High Courts have struck down the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise...

CENVAT Credit - duty paying invoices - performa invoices - the documents required under the Rule 9 are not confined to merely invoices but these may be any documents,...

Refund of excess payment of duty - Sale of goods through depot - Valuation - The duty is payable in accordance with the Section 4 of Central Excise Valuation Rules ,...

Taxable event in case of ‘Central Excise’ and ‘Sales Tax’ is different. While ‘manufacture’ is the event in case of Central Excise; the taxable event in the case of VAT...

Revocation of Central Excise Registration - very person, who produces or manufactures any excisable goods, shall get registered. Thus, without registration, the...

Recovery of confirmed dues and penalties - section 35 F of Central Excise Act, 1944, read with section 35C (2A) of Central Excise Act, 1944 and with rule 41 of Customs...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Quick Updates: