Penalty u/s 78 - the provisions that shall apply are those ...

Service Tax

September 10, 2015

Penalty u/s 78 - the provisions that shall apply are those existing at the time of commission of the offence. Therefore, there was no scope for the lower appellate authorities to reduce the penalty from the statutory stipulated penalty equal to amount of service tax short paid - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 78 - the provisions that shall apply are those ...

Service Tax

September 10, 2015

You may also like:

Whether the unamended provision of Section 78 according to which 100% penalty or amended provision of Section 78 according to which 50% penalty is applicable in the case...

Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - provisions of Section 78 having been invoked and penalty imposed, Section 76 penalty may not be justified - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - taxability of Sale of Space or Time for Advertisement - it is a case of bonafide mistake - no penalty - AT

Imposition of penalty - amended Section 78 shall clearly apply at the time of Adjudication of the show cause notice. Therefore, the penalty is imposable equal to 50% of...

Demand of service tax from the Sub-contractor - Demand of service tax with interest confirmed - Levy of penalty u/s 77 & 78 waived invoking the provisions of section 80- AT

Issue of SCN and payment of penalty - Clarification regarding the provisions of Section 73, 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944

Commissioner cannot go beyond the provisions applicable at the time of occurrence of offence - AT

Amendment in Service Tax vide Finance Act, 2012 to the existing provisions empowering the CBEC to withdraw the provisions of positive list shall be effective from...

Penalty u/s 78 - failure to discharge tax - Construction services - both the authorities below have rightly imposed and upheld penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from...

Quick Updates: