Denial of refund claim - payment of service tax which was not ...

Refund Denied Due to Limitation; Duty as Deposit Exempt from Section 11-B Time Limit in Central Excise Act.

September 23, 2015

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Denial of refund claim - payment of service tax which was not leviable - Bar of limitation - that duty paid but not statutorily leviable has to be considered as a deposit with the Govt. and time limit specified in Section 11-B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 will not be applicable - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial of refund claim - payment of service tax which was not ...

Refund Denied Due to Limitation; Duty as Deposit Exempt from Section 11-B Time Limit in Central Excise Act.

September 23, 2015

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Refund claim for amount deposited in PLA, whether duty or not, subject to time limitation u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. Held that Apex court in Modipon Ltd. case...

This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

Levy and collection of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED), Road and Infrastructure Cess (RIC), and Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC) on removal...

Refund claim was rejected as time-barred, having been filed beyond the one-year limitation period stipulated u/s 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant had...

Refund of service tax paid - payment of tax due to mistake in facts or of law - period of limitation - The law with respect to the deposits being made by the assessee...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - time limitation - Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules itself clearly specifying that such refund claims would be subject to “such safeguards,...

Interest on delayed refund - Extended Period of limitation - Section 6 of the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 and...

Refund of amount paid by the petitioner during the pendency of its appeal - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - amounts deposited in terms of Section 131 of...

CESTAT denied interest claim on pre-deposit refund made u/s 35F of Central Excise Act. Pre-deposit from 2012 was refunded in 2018 post-favorable appeal outcome. While...

Interpretation of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding the recovery of amounts collected as excise duty but not deposited with the government. The key...

Seeking refunds of amount to the liquidation account of the Corporate Debtor - Present is a case where for refund, to which the Corporate Debtor is entitled, whether the...

Power to issue SCN - Recovery of erroneous refund with interest - It is more than apparent that section 11A of the Excise Act cannot be resorted to by the Department for...

The appellants claimed that the entire amount of service tax paid by them should be considered as a deposit u/s 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and sought a refund....

The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are:...

Quick Updates: