Since Commissioner (Appeals) has not followed the law declared ...

Commissioner (Appeals) penalized Rs. 2500 for ignoring Larger Bench law, burdening appellant with litigation costs.

September 29, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Since Commissioner (Appeals) has not followed the law declared by the Larger Bench, exemplary cost of ₹ 2500/- imposed for burdening the appellant for unnecessary litigation costs, for burdening the Tribunal as also for showing scant respect for the law declared by the higher authorities - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Since Commissioner (Appeals) has not followed the law declared ...

Commissioner (Appeals) penalized Rs. 2500 for ignoring Larger Bench law, burdening appellant with litigation costs.

September 29, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Maintainability of appeal before tribunal - Seizure of goods - Section 110(A) - Two member bench disagrees with the decision of larger bench - matter referred to the...

Referring matter to larger bench - It is not open to the Referral Bench to appreciate the judgment rendered by the earlier Bench as if sitting in appeal to hold that the...

Right of department to file any appeal or cross-objections before the Commissioner (Appeals) against Refund order - the Department could neither have filed an appeal...

Reference the matter to the larger bench of 3 members by the Single Member Bench - Even if the learned Member hearing this appeal found it difficult to accept the view...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) - Initially the appellant was advised to file a representation before the Chief Commissioner against...

The Chief Justice, in his administrative capacity, cannot constitute a Larger Bench for the purpose of deciding a pure question of law simply because the Chief Justice...

Appointment of a arbitrator - requirement of sufficient stamping of documents - Although we agree that there is a need to constitute a larger Bench to settle the...

Judgment of the Larger Bench of Tribunal on Aluminum dross and skimming – reg. - Order-Instruction

The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant and set aside the impugned order disallowing CENVAT credit taken on input services used in BTS (Base Transceiver...

Introduction of the authority of Joint Commissioner (Appeals) - In order to reduce burden or bottleneck of small cases with small amount of disputes and demand from...

Section 142(3) of the CGST Act 2017 is a provision for entertaining and allowing refund of credit, but the refund's eligibility and admissibility under existing law is...

The case pertains to the classification of goods, specifically Biovita, under the appropriate Central Excise Tariff heading. The show cause notice relied on a CBEC...

Specifies Jurisdiction of Chief Commissioner of Customs and Commissioner of Customs (appeals) - Notification

The case involves timeliness of appeal filed u/s 85(3A) of Finance Act, 1994 before Commissioner (Appeals-II) and refund claim. The Appellate Tribunal found that the...

Maintainability of appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) - reassessment of bill of entry - if an assessee wants to challenge the assessment of bill of entry, he...

Quick Updates: