Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2015 Year 2015 This

Revision u/s 263 - erroneous and prejudicial to revenue order - ...


Taxpayer's 'Nil' Income Return Revised u/s 263 for Omitting Pension Earnings; Order Deemed Erroneous and Prejudicial.

October 3, 2015

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 - erroneous and prejudicial to revenue order - assessee himself admitted of having earned pension income. That being so, how and under what circumstances, assessee filed his return of income showing ‘nil’ income and the AO also overlooked to consider pension income is not understood - revision uphold - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The taxpayer filed an original return which was processed by the CPC. Subsequently, a revised return was filed u/s 139(5) with a self-assessment tax of Rs. 10,820/-....

  2. Income from pension fund u/s 10(23AAB) - CIT(A) admitted the fresh claim - Claim of exemption when the income is taxable u/s 44 - If the assessee failed to revise its...

  3. Rental income determination - assessee jointly owns 50% house property in Singapore with wife - offered 100% rental income for AY 2014-15 erroneously, rectified in...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - reopening of assessment u/s 147 after filing of revised return - Revised return was not filed in response to notice issued u/s.148 and therefore,...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - income voluntarily offered before commencement of assessment proceedings - the time limit for furnishing the revised return of income u/s 139(5)...

  6. Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

  7. When the AO rejects the revised return then the whole return is invalid. In case AO makes addition from the revised return then it means that he recognizes the revised...

  8. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the revised return of income filed by the assessee cannot be treated as invalid by the Assessing Officer (AO). Since the AO...

  9. Addition of amount shown in revised return under the pressure of the department - revised return should relate back to the return originally filed, minus the omissions...

  10. Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1)...

  11. Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - belated return u/s 139(4) - Subsequently revised - request of rectification based on revised return - not permissible as belated...

  12. Rectification of mistake u/s 154 against intimation u/s. 143(1) - Rejection on the ground that, revised return was not authenticated - The ITAT recognize the mistake in...

  13. The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

  14. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment of income was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) alleged that the assessee understated turnover and concealed income...

  15. Validity of manual revised returns filed - scheme of demerger approved - scheme of arrangement approved by NCLT required Petitioner and Hind Lamps to file revised...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates