Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2015 Year 2015 This

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - It is a misconception in the mind of ...

Income Tax

October 10, 2015

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - It is a misconception in the mind of assessee but he has not deliberately withheld something from the Assessing Officer. He has accounted these receipts in the next year and rather raised the dispute with regard to credit of the TDS - No penalty - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. AO rightly levied the penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) as the assessee has deliberately given inaccurate particulars of income.

  2. Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - revised return filed - assessee has adopted the recourse of avoiding litigation, therefore, revised the return to buy peace of mind - no...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1(c) - With the omission of the expression ‘deliberately’, mens rea is no longer a prerequisite for imposition of penalty - penalty under Section...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - price charged by the assessee in international transactions have not been computed in accordance with the provisions contained in section 92C -...

  5. Penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) - Suo-moto declaration of undisclosed assets located outside India under section 59 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The calibre and expertise of the assessee has little or nothing to do with the inadvertent error. - SC

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(b)- assessee refused to answer the notice u/s 142(1) - assessee was an attorney of some account holder - levy of penalty confimred - HC

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - Penalty has been levied in a mechanical manner without application of mind. In our view, this is a serious mistake in the...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO initiated penalty on one limb of section 271(1)(c) and had imposed penalty on another limb - Third Member has upheld the view of AM that the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates