Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - price charged by the assessee in ...

Penalty Confirmed for Incorrect Pricing in International Transactions u/s 271(1)(c), Violating Section 92C Provisions.

October 25, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - price charged by the assessee in international transactions have not been computed in accordance with the provisions contained in section 92C - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - price charged by the assessee in ...

Penalty Confirmed for Incorrect Pricing in International Transactions u/s 271(1)(c), Violating Section 92C Provisions.

October 25, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Transfer pricing adjustment - assessee advanced interest free loan to its AE - The Tribunal noted that the assessee had disclosed all...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Transfer Pricing adjustment made - applying the analysis of the term ‘good faith’ and ‘due diligence’ we are of the considered view that in the...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

TPA - where the variation between the arm’s length price determined u/s 92C and the price at which the international transaction or specified domestic transaction has...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - credit worthiness and genuineness of the transaction - Gifts by family friends – the explanation given by the assessee is totally false -...

The case involved a dispute over penalty imposition u/ss 271(1)(c) versus 271(1B) for additions related to estimated income from share trading transactions. The...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Section 271(1)(c) penalty was held invalid due to improper issuance of notice, as no proceedings were pending when the notice was issued on 19.12.2019. Section 271A...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - difference of income in the return filed u/s.139(1) and 153A - there was no such allegation that of assessee was found to be the owner of any...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Default by assessee - mens rea is not an essential element for imposing penalty for non compliance of notices issued by AO - penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for denying deduction u/s 80DD for a disabled person with over 80% disability. The assessee, a retired individual, had submitted...

Quick Updates: