Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2015 Year 2015 This

Refund claim - Even if it is shown on the 'expense side' that ...

Central Excise

October 11, 2015

Refund claim - Even if it is shown on the 'expense side' that does not mean that the presumption that the burden has been passed to the consumer can be raised - Revenue cannot invoke the plea or principle of unjust enrichment to the undisputed facts and circumstances - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refund - burden of proof – Where a person claims refund of fine or penalty, there can be no presumption that he has passed on this incidence to any other person - AT

  2. Refund - unjust enrichment - Merely because the amount was shown as expenditure it cannot be concluded that the burden of tax has been passed on to other indirectly - AT

  3. Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

  4. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - the Chartered Accountant’s Certificate has categorically certified that the burden has not been passed on to another. These documents...

  5. Denial of refund claim - Merely because, the assessee sold the vehicles at loss would not mean that the incidence of duty had not been passed on to the customers - HC

  6. Refund of Service Tax - unjust enrichment - seeking refund to customers - there is no provision, whatsoever, in section 11B by which one person who has paid the service...

  7. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - If the burden of Excise Duty is passed on to the others, it gets reflected in the Bills and invoices. That is a positive evidence....

  8. Refund of export duty paid in excess - conclusive evidence to discharge the burden of unjust enrichment - The CESTAT observed that the contract between the buyer and...

  9. Claim of expenses disallowed u/s 37(1) - expenditure/loss incurred on abandoned project – for the first two years the expenditure is shown as “work-in-progress” - claim...

  10. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - The payment of service tax was borne by the appellant themselves and the same was not collected from the service receiver. It is also...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates