Duty demand u/s 11A - the petitioner / director is not liable ...

Central Excise

October 11, 2015

Duty demand u/s 11A - the petitioner / director is not liable to be proceeded against for the recovery of Government dues pertaining to the company. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Duty demand u/s 11A - the petitioner / director is not liable ...

Central Excise

October 11, 2015

You may also like:

Determination of duty u/s 11A (2) before demanding interest –- duty was deposited before issuance of show cause notice - SCN demanding interest portion is not invalid - AT

Demand of excess paid drawback – recovery of duty drawback after revision in rate can be initiated u/s 11A read with Rule 16 of duty drawback rules, 1998 - CGOVT

Expiry of warehousing period - amount realized through auction could not meet the dues of the Government, demand raised for recovery of balance demand - demand confirmed - HC

Closure of their factory due to disconnection of power supply - demand of central excise duty - power connection of the appellant unit was never restored during the...

For demanding interest also limitation u/s 11A will be applicable and therefore, if the suppression, fraud, mis-declaration, etc., are not proved, interest also cannot...

Appointment of directors - in addition to Director Identification Number, a director may hold any other identification number prescribed by Central Government under...

Interest is liable to paid even if no SCN is issued u/s 11A of central excise - order of CESTAT reversed - HC

Clarification regarding Duty Drawback allowed in cases of short realization of export proceeds due to bank charges deducted by foreign banks

Clarification regarding duty drawback allowed in cases of short realisation of export proceeds due to bank charges deducted by foreign banks

Recovery of arrears of tax / duty of company from the director of company - The action of the respondents in compelling the petitioner to clear the dues of the company...

Quick Updates: