Claim for Refund of Penalty – Once the orders-in-original have ...

Appellate Commissioner Annuls Orders; Respondent Cannot Retain Deposits for Duties Made by Petitioners.

October 12, 2015

Case Laws Customs HC

Claim for Refund of Penalty – Once the orders-in-original have been set aside, the Respondent has no authority to retain the amounts deposited by the petitioners towards duty after being annulled by the orders passed by the Appellate Commissioner - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Claim for Refund of Penalty – Once the orders-in-original have ...

Appellate Commissioner Annuls Orders; Respondent Cannot Retain Deposits for Duties Made by Petitioners.

October 12, 2015

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

Petitioner challenged adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 regarding discrepancies in returns, short payment of tax, and excess availment of Input Tax...

Interpretation of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding the recovery of amounts collected as excise duty but not deposited with the government. The key...

Refund of amount deposited during investigation proceedings - voluntary deposit or not - Recovery of wrongful input tax credit - The Court found that in the instant...

Petitioner pre-deposited Rs. 6,25,000/- as condition for filing appeal u/s 51 of TNVAT Act against Assessment Order dated 21.10.2010. After revised Assessment Order on...

Validity of demand - order has been passed without proper notice to petitioner - Before passing any order, a personal hearing shall be given to petitioner with atleast...

HC rejected Petitioner's application for unconditional tax demand stay, affirming the requirement to deposit 20% of the contested tax amount. The court found the deposit...

Refund of amount retained without authority of law - It is well settled that once such amounts were deposited by the petitioner and were retained by the department...

HC quashed tax demand order under GST Act due to procedural irregularities in notice service. Petitioner claimed no awareness of notices or orders, preventing timely...

Petitioner deposited amount under alleged coercion and protest, claiming inadmissible Input Tax Credit availed. Respondent disputed coercion, stating voluntary deposit....

Rejection of refund claim - Period of limitation - These admitted facts are sufficient admission to the fact that the goods were never cleared for home consumption....

A Non-Resident Indian residing in Saudi Arabia made fixed deposits from remittances received in Dubai and maturity proceeds of existing term deposits, interest on NRE...

The order dismissing the appeal due to non-payment of the mandatory pre-deposit amount u/s 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was challenged. The court relied on a...

Interest on pre-deposit - payment of duty after reversal of duty debited in DEPB scrips is pre-deposit OR duty payment - there cannot be any duty at all when the issue...

Petitioner challenged order u/s 73 of GST Act creating demand, as notices were uploaded on GST portal's 'Additional Notices and Orders' tab, unbeknownst to petitioner...

Discrepancies between input tax credit availed by petitioner in GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A. Court granted partial relief by setting aside impugned order...

Quick Updates: