The penalty imposed on the employees of the appellant company ...

Central Excise

October 19, 2015

The penalty imposed on the employees of the appellant company cannot be sustained for the reason that they worked on the basis of the instruction of the employer. There is no material available the employees of the appellant company had gained in any manner - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

The penalty imposed on the employees of the appellant company ...

Central Excise

October 19, 2015

You may also like:

It was open for the Settlement Commission to impose penalty on the directors in addition to imposing penalty on the company, if there was material justifying imposition...

Quantum of penalty levied under Section 114 (iii) of the Customs Act, 1962 - fraudulent export as goods were grossly undervalued - the appellant has acted only on the...

Levy of GST - payment of notice pay by an employee to the applicant employer in lieu of notice period, under clause 5(e) of Schedule II of CGST Act - GST is not...

Construction Services - composite Works Contracts - for sole reason of not filing the intimation opting to pay service under Works Contract Service, the demand cannot sustain.

Demand of service tax on the amount of reimbursement of payroll cost for the expatriate employees deputed - to ascertain whether the employer employee relation exists,...

Whether penalty can be imposed upon the importer for some misdeeds of the employee of their clearing agent during customs clearance of their imported goods - No penalty - AT

Tax paid by the employer on the salary/remuneration of the employee - Section 17(2) - such payment was to be excluded from the income of the employees - AT

Valuation - Job-work - The valuation of job worked goods computed by the department on the basis of cost of raw material + job work charges is incorrect.

Penalty u/s 271)1)(c) - penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income can neither be imposed nor sustained on enhancement of net profit rate based on an estimate

Levy of penalty for abetment - penalty cannot be imposed merely on the basis of assumption and presumption and without any basis - HC

Quick Updates: