Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2016 Year 2016 This

Levy of penalty for abetment - penalty cannot be imposed merely ...


Penalties for Abetment Require Concrete Evidence, Not Just Assumptions or Presumptions, to Justify Legal Action.

May 13, 2016

Case Laws     Central Excise     HC

Levy of penalty for abetment - penalty cannot be imposed merely on the basis of assumption and presumption and without any basis - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. CESTAT set aside penalties imposed under s.112(a) and s.112(b) of Customs Act 1962 against appellant for alleged gold smuggling. Court found insufficient evidence beyond...

  2. Levy of penalty u/s 112 of Customs Act - illicit import of Gold and silver - misdeclaration of goods - The Revenue, having alleged one Salman as the mastermind, has not...

  3. HC invalidated ex-parte assessment order and demand notices that were solely based on a previously quashed FIR. The department failed to conduct independent...

  4. Additions based on entries in the Diary - Presumption u/s 292C - without substantiating the content of the noting in the diary, the value adopted by way of decoding by...

  5. The case pertains to an addition made u/s 69 for unexplained investment in agricultural land at Ratlam. The issue revolved around whether the addition was based on...

  6. The trial court erroneously invoked the presumption u/s 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, without considering the contradictions in the evidence of the...

  7. Dishonour of Cheque - The High Court observed that, the presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act is a presumption of law, as distinguished from the presumption of...

  8. Penalty u/s 129(1)(b) - Part-B of the e-way bill was not filled up - The High Court held that, upon a perusal of the order in appeal, it is crystal clear that the...

  9. Addition on account of household withdrawal – assumptions and presumptions - The presumption made by the AO and estimation made was very much realistic - AT

  10. Penalty imposed u/s 114(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 for alleged abetment of illegal export by arranging lorries. Lack of admissible evidence showing knowledge of goods...

  11. Clandestine removal of goods - assumption / presumption - demand based on the statement - charge of clandestine removal is not sustainable in the absence of any...

  12. Penalty u/s. 271(l)(c) - The words may direct that such person shall pay by way of penalty in section 271 leave a certain amount of discretion in imposition of penalty...

  13. The case involves the validity of assessments u/s 153A and 132 of the Income Tax Act. In the absence of incriminating material seized during the search, assessments...

  14. Additions towards Undisclosed profit from contract work and transport income - The tribunal found that the assumptions made by Ld. AO are without any basis, on the...

  15. Clandestine removal - excess usage of raw material Sponge Iron, than mentioned - the entire demand is based on mere average yield of production and no concrete evidence...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates