Revision u/s 263 - AO while completing the assessment u/s 143(3) ...

Income Tax

October 22, 2015

Revision u/s 263 - AO while completing the assessment u/s 143(3) never applied his mind to various issues as pointed out by the CIT - revision upheld - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - AO while completing the assessment u/s 143(3) ...

Income Tax

October 22, 2015

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - Merely because that the AO did not discuss these details in the assessment order does not mean that he has not applied his mind.

Revision u/s 263 - assessment order passed u/s 153A r.w.s 143(3) - no any incriminating material unearthed by search team therefore Assessing Officer’s order is not erroneous.

Revision u/s 263 - assessment order passed by the AO is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. First of all, the AO has considered the issue...

Revision u/s 263 - As on date that in an unabated year the addition can only be made on the basis of incriminating material. Therefore having regards to the legal...

Revision u/s 263 - Period of limitation - if the issue on which the proceedings u/s 263 is initiated is not a subject matter of the assessment order passed u/s 143(3)...

Revision u/s 263 - Revision barred by limitation or not? - Period to be computed from the date of original assessment u/s 143(3) or from the date of subsequent order...

Revision u/s 263 - tds credit issue non examination by AO - non examination of an issue by the AO renders the assessment erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue

Revision u/s 263 - Period of limitation - To be commenced from original assessment order or re-assessment order u/s 147 - In the case on hand, the jurisdiction under...

Reopening of assessment - AO seeks to reopen the assessment on a mere change of opinion inasmuch as, at the time of scrutiny assessment, AO had applied his mind to the...

Revision u/s 263 - Merely because the balance sheet and P&L account are placed before the AO at the time of assessment, it cannot be construed that the AO had verified...

Quick Updates: