Revenue has sought to open assessments which had been finalised ...

Customs

October 27, 2015

Revenue has sought to open assessments which had been finalised more than five years ago on grounds of mis-declaration of goods – Assessments were finalised after thorough investigation process – No justifiable reason found to recover differential duty after lapse of 5 years - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revenue has sought to open assessments which had been finalised ...

Customs

October 27, 2015

You may also like:

Invocation of longer period of limitation against the appellants on the ground that they got the assessments finalised from the Central excise authorities by...

When there is mis-declaration of goods, show cause notice can be issued within a period of five years from the date of findng mis-declaration by the investigating authority - AT

Re-opening of proceedings - Only revisional authority has power to seek re-opening of proceedings when Re-assessment order was prejudicial to the interest of revenue - HC

Re-opening of Assessment – Fixation of tax rate at 16% against 10% –Revenue was not justified in demanding tax at 16% by seeking to reopen concluded assessments by...

RTI - Appellant has sought total Income Tax dues written off in last five years, year-wise - There is no reason why this information should not be placed in public domain - CIC

Validity of assessments u/s 153A – when nothing incriminating material was found in the course of search, completed / finalized assessments for such years could not be...

Seeks to levy Anti-dumping duty on imports of Sodium Hydrosulphite, originating in, or exported from People’s Republic of China, for a further period of five years - Notification

Valuation of goods - US list price as worked out by the Revenue should be the basis and duty demand confirmed on that basis and assessments should be finalized on that basis - AT

The income tax department cannot presume something to have happened five years ago just because in the assessment year 1997-98 the assessee failed to explain its source...

Reopening of assessment - case was reopened on a ground but additions were made on different ground - it was not open to him to make the addition for unaccounted investment

Quick Updates: