Rejection of permission to remove the goods for further ...

Permission to Remove Goods for Processing u/r 16C of Central Excise Rules 2002 Rejected as Legally Unsustainable.

November 2, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Rejection of permission to remove the goods for further processing under Rule 16C of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - permission under Rule 16C is not legally sustainable. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rejection of permission to remove the goods for further ...

Permission to Remove Goods for Processing u/r 16C of Central Excise Rules 2002 Rejected as Legally Unsustainable.

November 2, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Refusal to grant of permission to remove the goods for further processing under Rule 16C of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - The order does not mention any specific...

Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

Applicability of provision of Rule 16B and 16C of CER, 2002 - permission to clear the goods under provisions of Rule 16B without payment of duty to their sister concern...

Revocation of Central Excise Registration - very person, who produces or manufactures any excisable goods, shall get registered. Thus, without registration, the...

The rebate of duty paid as CVD on the Imported inputs utilized in the manufacture/processing of exported goods is admissible under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - HC

Rebate of duty on exports - Compound duty on Pan Masala Packing - Rule 14 - the stand of the department that no rebate can be allowed under Rule 14 of the Central Excise...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Vires of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - At least four different High Courts have struck down the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise...

Remission of duty under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - In case of breakage/destruction of final product, remission can be claimed under Rule 21 of Central...

Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

Warehousing - Rejection of request for permission under Rule 4(4) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 to store excisable goods out side the factory premises without payment of...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS...

Rule 11 of the central Excise Rules read with Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules,2002 - TThe reason that the goods were not available to confiscation should not be a...

This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

Quick Updates: