Refund claim - Unjust enrichment - recovery of duty by ...

Court Rules on Refund Claim: Doctrine of Unjust Enrichment Applied, Stay Order Vacated for Non-Compliance.

November 2, 2015

Case Laws Customs SC

Refund claim - Unjust enrichment - recovery of duty by encashment of the Bank Guarantee - earlier stay order was vacated due to failure comply with stay order - it had to be decided in the light of the doctrine of unjust enrichment which was clearly applicable - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - Unjust enrichment - recovery of duty by ...

Court Rules on Refund Claim: Doctrine of Unjust Enrichment Applied, Stay Order Vacated for Non-Compliance.

November 2, 2015

Case Laws Customs SC

You may also like:

Refund – doctrine of unjust enrichment would not apply to fine and penalty - AT

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Remission of Central Excise Duty - The tribunal found Rule 21 inapplicable, as it pertains to goods lost or destroyed before clearance from the factory, not to loss of...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

The appellant sought refund of countervailing duty (CVD) paid while importing goods declared as 'Natural gum in raw form' through Bills of Entry filed during 2011-2014....

Denial of refund claim - Finalization of provisional assessment - prior to the amendment i.e. 13-7-2006, this doctrine of unjust enrichment was not attracted to refund...

Permissibility of refund claims and the applicability of the unjust enrichment doctrine. The judicial view emphasizes the principles of economic and distributive...

Excess duty paid due to issuance of credit notes to dealers and stockists after clearance of goods was rejected on grounds of incidence being passed on and lack of...

CESTAT ruled that in provisional assessment cases, adjustments of excess duty payments against shortfalls must be handled comprehensively. The tribunal determined that...

HC allowed the petition, directing re-adjudication of ITC refund claims for February 2021 to February 2022. The court held that Notification No. 14/2022 is clarificatory...

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Quick Updates: