Tribunal was not justified in accepting the additional evidence ...

Income Tax

November 3, 2015

Tribunal was not justified in accepting the additional evidence filed by the assessee at the second appellate stage, and we are also of the view that the reasons assigned by the assessee for not having produced the same earlier before the Assessing Officer, is not worthy of acceptance - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Tribunal was not justified in accepting the additional evidence ...

Income Tax

November 3, 2015

You may also like:

Validity of recall of order - Whether the Tribunal was justified in recalling its earlier order on an application for rectification filed by the assessee - Held no,...

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of admission of additional evidence - Bench has to evaluate the admissibility of the additional evidence and then, it has to...

Reversal of credit - once accepted, the revenue cannot turn around and dispute the manner of reversal without bringing any additional evidence or point of law, not...

Rejection of refund claim - Commissioner of Appeals and also the Tribunal have both grossly erred in not looking into the additional evidence, which has been produced...

Unexplained deposits - the CIT (A) has neither verified the evidence by herself nor has called for any remand report from the AO, but has summarily accepted the evidence...

Addition to income - additional evidence submitted by assessee allowed - AT

Gift received from relatives - unexplained cash credit u/s 69 - Tribunal found that the assessee had not made out grounds to permit to bring in such additional evidence...

Admission of additional evidence - Merely because a document was not filed before the Assessing Officer, the same cannot be rejected on surmises and in the totality of...

Additional evidence - rule 46A - Appellate authority should not refuse to make enquiry in the case where facts and circumstances so demand - CIT(A) directed to consider...

Non acceptance of fresh evidence submitted u/r 46A of the I. T. Rules by CIT(A) - Tribunal noted that, it is possible that in the transition, the ld.CIT(A)[NFAC] had not...

Quick Updates: