Remission of duty - Original Authority rejected the remission ...

Central Excise

November 16, 2015

Remission of duty - Original Authority rejected the remission application on the ground that the appellant did not take proper care to prevent the fire. - reason for rejection of remission and consequently confirmation of demand is not legally tenable - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Remission of duty - Original Authority rejected the remission ...

Central Excise

November 16, 2015

You may also like:

Remission of duty - Lost goods - When the importer made a request to the department claiming remission, the authorities did not dispute the transactions - remission allowed - HC

Refund claim - claim was filled before wrong jurisdictional office - before rejecting the application, file should have been transferred to correct jurisdiction by the...

Requirement for claiming remission of duty - clearance of defective finished goods as Waste/scrap goods - once goods entered into RG-1 registered, it is necessary that a...

Application to destroy Molasses as unfit for human consumption – thus the application for the remission of the duty liability needs to be allowed - AT

Remission of duty - leakage of the tank where molasses were stored - remission rejected on the ground that the application was not filed within the prescribed period of...

Refund claim rejected as time bar - The original authority and the lower appellate authority being creatures of the statute, prima facie are required to follow the...

Destruction of goods - remission of duty - “Manikchand” brand Gutkha/ Pan Masala, which the appellant was not in a position to sale in the market due to order of the...

CENVAT Credit - Remission of duty - Loss of goods in dacoity - even if this is treated as a case of dacoity, the remission of duty cannot be allowed - AT

Remission of duty - assessee are entitled for remission of duty on inputs gone in the manufacturing process which has been lost in fire - AT

Remission of duty - storage loss and remission of excise duty leviable on 895 quintals of sugar beyond the permissible limit of 0.5 is not condonable - HC

Quick Updates: