DST - The imposition of penalty is not automatic even assuming ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

November 27, 2015

DST - The imposition of penalty is not automatic even assuming that the reassessment was justified. The fact that there was a dissenting opinion by one of the Members of the Tribunal, does indicate that it is not a case of concealment of particulars but a case where there is a possible interpretation in favour of the Assessee. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

DST - The imposition of penalty is not automatic even assuming ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

November 27, 2015

You may also like:

Penalty u/s. 271(l)(c) - The words may direct that such person shall pay by way of penalty in section 271 leave a certain amount of discretion in imposition of penalty...

Whether levy of penalty u/S 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is automatic – Imposition of penalty is not automatic. - HC

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

It was open for the Settlement Commission to impose penalty on the directors in addition to imposing penalty on the company, if there was material justifying imposition...

Levy of penalty - Whether imposition of penalty under Section 43(2) of the Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (OVAT Act) can only be levied if the escapement is “without...

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

ST - Whether the penalty imposable under the Finance Act, 1994 is automatic – Held no - HC

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Levy of penalty u/s. 221(1) - Reading of Sec. 221 shows that the Explanation wherein as “may” not “shall” which is subjective of the fact that imposition of penalty is...

The High Court held that the jurisdictional facts necessary to invoke Section 147 for reassessment were absent. The reassessment was initiated after the four-year...

Imposition of penalty u/s 76(2)(b) of RVAT - The material columns remained unfilled and equally important fact that VAT-47 was not at all punched is sufficient to hold...

The case involved a dispute over penalty imposition u/ss 271(1)(c) versus 271(1B) for additions related to estimated income from share trading transactions. The...

Imposition of penalty - section 112(b) of Customs Act - smuggling - diamonds - The active role of these Appellant, do not justify imposition of heavy penalty under...

Imposition of penalty - inadmissible availment/utilization of Cenvat credit in the name of Baddi unit - In the instant case, the ‘surrender’ is not voluntary and levy of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has accepted the additions made in the assessment does not by itself justify the imposition of penalty for concealment - AT

Quick Updates: