Multiple show cause notices issued with overlapping ...

Overlapping notices led to confusion, violated natural justice - Order set aside, Petitioner to pay Rs 1.4 cr for fresh hearing.

September 18, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Multiple show cause notices issued with overlapping discrepancies, resulting in confusion and lack of opportunity for petitioner to respond adequately. Impugned order passed without considering circumstances and violating principles of natural justice. Order u/s 73 set aside, matter remanded for fresh consideration upon petitioner paying Rs. 1,40,00,000/- within four weeks. Petition disposed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Multiple show cause notices issued with overlapping ...

Overlapping notices led to confusion, violated natural justice - Order set aside, Petitioner to pay Rs 1.4 cr for fresh hearing.

September 18, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271B - no tax audit conducted u/s 44AB - bonafide belief - When Gross profit is more than Rs.4 crores, it means the Gross Receipts were definitely more than...

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

HC held that issuance of Summary of Show Cause Notice in Form GST DRC-01 without a proper Show Cause Notice u/s 73 of CGST/SGST Act is invalid. Proper Show Cause Notice...

Non-issuance of a proper Show Cause Notice u/s 73(1) of the State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (AGST Act) prior to passing the impugned order u/s 73(9) violates...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

The HC determined that issuing two show cause notices (SCNs) under different subsections of Section 28 for identical factual matrices is impermissible. The impugned SCN...

Challenge to penalty order u/s 129(1) of CGST Act for non-generation of Part-B of E-way bill. Petitioner accepted notice and paid Rs. 11,08,150 penalty voluntarily...

Challenge related to classification of imported goods - light green tinted float glass under CTH 70052110 or CTH 70051010. Invocation of extended period of limitation...

The HC quashed the impugned order dated 14.12.2023 for violation of principles of natural justice. The respondent failed to issue a proper and prior show cause notice...

Section 12(1)(b) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 requires reporting entities to furnish information about transactions referred to in Section 12(1)(a) to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - default on the part of the assessee for not complying with the notices issued by the AO u/s 142(1) - Even if the AO issued 4 notices under...

Anti Dumping Duty - When the object of both the paragraphs of the policy is looked into, that brings out difference between the two. Paragraph 4.1.1 deals with normal...

Adjustment u/s 143(1) disallowing revenue expenditure claim u/s 11(1) was made without providing reasonable opportunity to assessee, violating second Proviso of Section...

Rejection of petition challenging classification of "Autoclaved Aerated Concrete blocks" (AAC Blocks) under residuary Entry 69 of Part C instead of proposed Entry 15 of...

Quick Updates: