Revision u/s 263 - AO on merits has allowed the case u/s 54F of ...

Income Tax

January 12, 2016

Revision u/s 263 - AO on merits has allowed the case u/s 54F of the Act in accordance with law. This cannot be a case for revision u/s 263 - A decision of the AO could not be prejudicial to the interest of the revenue simply because it did not make detailed discussion - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - AO on merits has allowed the case u/s 54F of ...

Income Tax

January 12, 2016

You may also like:

Appraisal report available but AO ignored, a fit case for revision u/s 263 - HC

Revision u/s 263 - AO though made inquiry about the claim made by the assessee, however, not discussed the same while passing assessment order. - It can be seen from the...

Revision u/s 263 - eligibility of claim for deduction u/s 54F - If it born out from record that AO has not examined the claim of assessee for deduction and allowed the...

Revision u/s 263 - allowing deduction u/s 54F in the absence of Long Term Capital Gain - When the assessee has not held the flats for a minimum period of 3 years, the...

Revision u/s 263 - expenditure on purchased CDs on Jain Religion - AO had carried out detailed enquiries and taken a plausible view and accepted the assessee's treatment...

Revision u/s 263 - Deduction u/s 80IC - Since, AO had not expressed any view in that behalf as is discernible from the assessment order, revision order sustained.

Revision u/s 263 - AO while completing the assessment u/s 143(3) never applied his mind to various issues as pointed out by the CIT - revision upheld - AT

Revision u/s 263 - In the instant case the order of the AO may be prejudicial to the interest of the revenue but it cannot be said to be erroneous since various judicial...

Revision u/s 263 - order cannot be passed by the CIT u/s 263 of the Act to ask the AO to decide whether the assessment order was erroneous or not - AT

Revision u/s 263 - LTCG - deduction as claimed by the assessee u/s 54F - Pr. CIT was not justified in imposing his view upon the assessing officer on wrong appreciation...

Quick Updates: