Maintainability of writ petition - whether the respondent has ...

Customs

January 13, 2016

Maintainability of writ petition - whether the respondent has got jurisdiction to demand differential customs duty beyond one year from the date of show cause notice are to be decided only by the appellate authority, but not by this Court. - Tri

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability of writ petition - whether the respondent has ...

Customs

January 13, 2016

You may also like:

Demand of differential duty - Undervaluation of goods - Merely because the value was enhanced by the Customs, the same would not become contemporaneous imports. - AT

Refund claim - Adjustment of differential duty in refund sanctioned - adjudicating authority rightly adjusted the refund claim against the demand of differential duty - AT

Demand of differential duty and interest - demand towards cash discounts availed for which prompt payments are not made by the customers within the specified period -...

Demand for interest on delayed payment of duty - appellant is liable to pay the interest on the differential duty paid through supplementary invoices.

Captive consumption - excise duty upon molasses - Suppression of value of goods - Demand of differential duty - The burden is upon the proper officer. - HC

Maintainability of writ petition - Time-barred petition – Writ proceedings are not for the purpose of granting extension of time - HC

Maintainability of the writ petition in HC - Validity of reassessment order passed - The petitioner raised concerns about procedural irregularities, including the lack...

Validity of assessment order - demand notice for lack of jurisdiction in the Assessing Officer - writ petition dismissed on account of availability of alternative remedy.

Demand of interest on differential duty - the claim of the appellant that since the assessment was provisional, therefore, interest is not applicable, is not correct,...

Demand of differential Duty - Revenue has only wasted its energy when there is no revenue loss and therefore, unjustifiably extended the larger period of limitation, for nothing.

Quick Updates: