Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Bill - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2016 Year 2016 This

Amendment of section 272A. - penalty for failure to answer ...


Section 272A Amended: Rs. 10,000 Penalty for Non-Compliance with Notices and Directions u/ss 142 and 143.

March 2, 2016

Act Rules     Bill

Amendment of section 272A. - penalty for failure to answer questions, sign statements, furnish information, returns or statements, allow inspections, etc. - to include levy of penalty of ten thousand rupees for each default or failure to comply with a notice issued under sub-section (1) of section 142 or sub-section (2) of section 143 or failure to comply with a direction issued under sub-section (2A) of section 142.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

  2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

  3. Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - non compliance to notices u/s 142(1) - The provisions of Section 272A(1)(d) is of deterrent in nature and not for earning revenue. The remedy...

  4. Section 142(1) notice issued by non-jurisdictional officer held valid. Plain reading of Section 143(2) indicates either Assessing Officer or prescribed income-tax...

  5. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) and / or 272A(1)(d) - assessee failed to comply notice under Section 142(1) - The assessment order was passed u/s 143(3) and not under...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) due to the Accountant's Covid-19...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

  8. Appellant failed to submit required documents within stipulated time for provisional duty assessment, contravening Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations,...

  9. AO proceeded with best judgment assessment u/s 144 making addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash deposit. CIT(A) upheld penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with...

  10. Levying penalty u/s 272A(1) - non-compliance of the notice - Nonappearance of the assessee in response to the initial notice under section 142(1) of the Act was not...

  11. The Appellate Tribunal held that the penalty imposed u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) was not legally valid. The Assessing Officer failed to...

  12. The AT found evidence of hawala transactions through a recovered notebook containing daily business accounts, despite the appellant's retraction. The tribunal...

  13. Penalty u/s. 272A(1)(d) - non compliance to notice u/s. 142(1) due to covid pandemic - addition u/s. 68 - As it is observed that when there is a reasonable cause for the...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - default of non-compliance of the statutory notice issued under section 142(1) r.w.s. 129 - where the assessment order was finally passed u/s...

  15. The HC quashed the impugned order dated 14.12.2023 for violation of principles of natural justice. The respondent failed to issue a proper and prior show cause notice...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates