Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2016 Year 2016 This

CHA - Some inadvertence or lack of efficiency took place on part ...


CHA Penalized for Inefficiency, Not Gross Negligence, Under Regulation 13(n) Due to Regular Importer Dealings.

March 9, 2016

Case Laws     Customs     AT

CHA - Some inadvertence or lack of efficiency took place on part of the CHA and that is because of a regular dealing with the said importers and not because of gross negligence or misconduct in discharge of duty. Therefore, the appellant needs to be visited with some penal action in view of violation of Regulation 13(n). - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Contravention of provisions of Regulation 13(e) and 13(o) of CHA Licensing Regulation, 2004. - CHA has not even claimed that it had ever verified the existence of the...

  2. Revocation of CHA Licence - the CHA firm is responsible for the forgery of documents by their employee. There is gross violation of Regulation 13(a), 13(d), 19(8) and...

  3. Imposition of penalty u/s 114AA on Importer and u/s 112 (a) on CHA - the importer took the risk and moved the goods out of the LCS on his own, without listening the...

  4. Revocation of CHA License - The CHA is supposed to safeguard the interest of both the importers and the customs. A lot of trust is pose in CHA by the importers/...

  5. Revocation of CHA License - Misdeclaration of goods - the appellant totally failed to discharge its duties as CHA with utmost speed and efficiency and thereby grossly...

  6. Banks failed to exercise due diligence by opening letters of credit and remitting foreign exchange despite non-submission of bills of entry and other mandatory documents...

  7. Appellant, a Customs House Agent (CHA), was exonerated from penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act. CESTAT held no evidence of appellant's abetment in misdeclaration of...

  8. Revocation of CHA licence - unauthorized usage of the CHA licence - Save and except venial breach on part of CHA under Regulation 13(n) of the CHALR, no other Articles...

  9. Customs broker's license revocation order set aside due to lack of evidence for alleged violations. Key findings: no proof of misdeclaration or undervaluation to...

  10. FTS in the given case would be taxed at the beneficial rate of 15% on gross receipts as provided in Article 13(2) of the India-UK DTAA. - the tax liability borne by GRSE...

  11. The appellant trust claimed to be formed for public charitable activities and registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act 1959, regularly filing its income tax...

  12. Levy of penalty on CHA - aiding and abetting the importer in the importation of three consignments of misdeclared goods including shoes, alkaline batteries and wooden...

  13. Denial of exemption u/s 11 was challenged due to alleged violations of Sections 13(1)(d), 13(2)(h), and 13(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The key points are: Section...

  14. Imposition of penalty on CHA - The CHA is not supposed to verify the each and every aspect about the business of importer as the Inspector of Department or investigating agency.

  15. Revocation of CHA licence – CHA sublet his licence for a consideration in gross violation of Regulation 12 of CHALR, 2004 and this is an act of corruption - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates