Refund claim rejected - bar of limitation - Relevant date - ...

Refund Claim Rejected Due to Missing Relevant Date in Clause 6, Notification No. 11/2002-C.E., Limitation Period Ineffective.

March 30, 2016

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Refund claim rejected - bar of limitation - Relevant date - Since, the second component of the limitation i.e. the relevant date from which the limitation period is to be counted is missing in Clause 6 of the Notification No. 11/2002-C.E. (N.T.), dated 1-3-2002, thus in view the limitation provision in this notification is meaningless. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim rejected - bar of limitation - Relevant date - ...

Refund Claim Rejected Due to Missing Relevant Date in Clause 6, Notification No. 11/2002-C.E., Limitation Period Ineffective.

March 30, 2016

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Refund of CENVAT Credit - time limitation - Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules itself clearly specifying that such refund claims would be subject to “such safeguards,...

HC affirmed tax authority's adjustment of AY 2010-11 refund against pre-existing tax liabilities of corporate debtor. Resolution applicant's claim to refund rejected on...

Interest rate on delayed refunds u/s 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 restricted to 6% p.a. as per Notification 67/2003-CE (N.T.), overruling appellant's claim of 12%....

Refund of excess tax paid - The refund claim under 11B was rejected by the Original Authority on the ground that the claim cannot be modified by the appellant to include...

The case pertains to the refund of service tax paid on input services utilized for the export of 'Cut and Polished Diamonds' during October 2015 to March 2016, as per...

The case involved a claim for refund of interest u/s 72 of Finance Act, 2010 to benefit from a retrospective amendment to Rule 6 of CCR, 2002/2004. The Tribunal held...

Refund claim - Notification No.17/2009 - it is clear that receipt submitted by the courier agency does not content the details as required under the notification -...

Claim of interest on refund as Rule 5 of CCR, 2002 - AT

Refund of service tax by way of self adjustment under rule 6(4A) / 6(4B) - In the present case the claim for refund has arisen on account of interpretation of law and...

The appellant is entitled to the benefit of notification no. 6/2002-CE and notification no. 6/2006 CE. The appellant reversed the Cenvat Credit attributable to the goods...

Application u/s 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 maintainable only with court's liberty upon withdrawal of previous application. Principles of Order 23...

Refund claim of the duty - Notification No. 21/2002 - short supplied goods are not used in the manufacture of intended finished goods - Therefore, the benefit of...

Project import - benefit of Notification No. 6/2002-CE dt.1.3.2002 - the exemption cannot be extended to turbine which converts heat energy into rotational energy...

Exemption u/s 11 - Scope of newly inserted section 11(6) - Depreciation on assets - Double benefit - Apex Court has as settled the issue - amendment brought in Section...

Appointment of an arbitrator - Declination to appoint an Arbitrator in exercise of its power under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - So far...

Quick Updates: