Whether the unamended provision of Section 78 according to which ...

CESTAT Rules for Assessee: Amended Section 78 Applies, Reduces Penalty from 100% to 50% for Recorded Transactions.

May 21, 2016

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Whether the unamended provision of Section 78 according to which 100% penalty or amended provision of Section 78 according to which 50% penalty is applicable in the case where transactions are recorded in the books of the assessee, when the offence was taken place during the period of unamended Section 78. - CESTAT applied the amended provisions in favor of assessee - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Whether the unamended provision of Section 78 according to which ...

CESTAT Rules for Assessee: Amended Section 78 Applies, Reduces Penalty from 100% to 50% for Recorded Transactions.

May 21, 2016

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Reduction of penalty u/s 78 of FA - non-payment of service tax - appellant has not recorded the said transactions in their specified records - Penalty reduced to 50% of...

Rental income determination - assessee jointly owns 50% house property in Singapore with wife - offered 100% rental income for AY 2014-15 erroneously, rectified in...

Benefit of reduced penalty - penalty not deposited - get the benefit of reduced penalty of 25% of the service tax (ST) u/s 78(1) of the FA, 1994, assessee required to...

Levy of penalty - Applicability of the substituted rule for imposition of penalty - The Supreme Court sided with the appellant, holding that the substituted rule from...

CENVAT Credit - Removal of capital goods - Depreciation - Deduction of 2.5% to be applied from the date of availing credit, not from the date of receiving or putting to...

Quantum of penalty under section 10(A) of the CST Act - The Tribunal after detailed analysis, came to the conclusion that there was mensrea on the part of the petitioner...

The case involved a dispute regarding the entitlement to a reduced penalty under the second proviso to Section 78(1) of the Finance Act 1994. The appellant had not...

Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty...

Levy of penalty - availing 100% credit instead of 50% and remaining 50% to be availed in the next Financial year in respect of capital goods - In this fact the case...

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(14) - no papers were produced despite the fact that goods were being imported from outside the State - There is always apprehension that in...

CESTAT determined that while rejection of declared transaction value of imported thoroughbred horses under Rule 10A of Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 was justified due to...

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of determining income from futures transactions. The Tribunal held that the AO's addition lacked transparency as no...

Assessee had claimed depreciation on carats @ 100%, however, AO allowed @ 50% - Depreciation on carats as claimed by the assessee is allowed - AT

Claim of depreciation - CIT(A) has reduced the purchase value by 50% and allowed depreciation thereon - CIT(A) failed to record that on what basis he has reduced 50% of...

CESTAT ruled that imported e-bike components without battery pack or electric compressor do not qualify for reduced duty rates (15% or 25%) under S.No. 531A(1)(a) or (b)...

Quick Updates: