Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has ...

Income Tax

July 7, 2016

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has ...

Income Tax

July 7, 2016

You may also like:

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - Undisclosed bank account - the assessee has not filed any satisfactory explanation or documentary evidence either before authorities...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - loan from friends and relatives for financing his son’s USA visa - when the evidences and explanation furnished in support of cash credits are...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee has failed to explain the source with support of evidence, but his explanation was not found to be false. The lapse committed at his end...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - credit worthiness and genuineness of the transaction - Gifts by family friends – the explanation given by the assessee is totally false -...

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO had come to the conclusion that for want of suppling sufficient material by the assessee, the claim of commission cannot be accepted - No penalty - HC

Addition of losses by using Client Code Modification - Appellant has not given satisfactory explanation with respect to the losses incurred by using Client Code...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c)- additions u/s 68 - the contention of the assessee cannot be straightway rejected that such error may occur due to software problem - AT

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Quick Updates: