Settlement Commission has erred in rejecting the petitioner’s ...

Service Tax

July 9, 2016

Settlement Commission has erred in rejecting the petitioner’s application for settlement dated 25.11.2013, by its order dated 14.11.2014, on the ground that the said application was barred by Section 32-(O)(1)(i) of the Act. - The Explanation to Section 32-O(1)(i) does not have retrospective effect - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Settlement Commission has erred in rejecting the petitioner’s ...

Service Tax

July 9, 2016

You may also like:

Income Tax Settlement Commission order - Waiver of interest - the Settlement Commission cannot re-open its concluded proceedings by invoking Section 154 of the Act so as...

Period of limitation - Relevant date - There is no dispute that the relevant date in the present case is 25.11.2012. Prior to this date on 28.05.2012, section 73(1) of...

CIRP - NCLT admitted the application - settlement entered into by the parties - Any settlement after passing of the impugned order and after constitution of the CoC is...

Validity of order passed by Settlement Commission - Unless the twin conditions mentioned therein are fulfilled, the Settlement Commission cannot move further in the...

Challenge against the order passed by the Settlement Commission - reason behind the creation of Settlement Commission is to give a quietus to the dispute between the two...

Amends Notification Nos. 92/2009-Cus dated 11.09.2009, 93/2009-Cus dated 11.09.2009, 94/2009-Cus dated 11.09.2009, 95/2009-Cus dated 11.09.2009 and 104/2009-Cus dated 14....

Rejection of request for waiver of interest while granting immunity from penalty and prosecution - order of Settlement Commission - the liability of the Petitioner to...

Settlement of case - before submitting reply to the show cause notice, approached the Settlement Commission - The dismissal of the application filed before the...

Withdrawal of CIRP Application filed u/s 12 A of IBC - settlement between the Appellants and the Corporate Debtor - On the day when the Application was filed, there was...

Whether continued detention of goods can be justified - This period of 6 months can be enlarged by the Commissioner of Customs by a further period of 6 months, by virtue...

Validity of Settlement Commission Order - when the High Court set aside the order of the Settlement Commission, the matter had to be remanded to the Settlement...

Validity of order of Settlement Commission - acceptance of additional income disclosed by the assessee - Petitioner/Income Tax authority could not make out any...

Validity of Settlement Commission orders - The case involved petitions seeking directives for the issuance of formal orders under section 245D (4) of the Income Tax Act,...

Refund claim - Period of limitation - Relevant Date - Finalization of provisional assessment - the appellant was required to make an application for refund within a...

Settlement commission power u/s 245D - Commission could have either rejected the application or allowed it to be proceeded further - When a duty is casts on the...

Quick Updates: