Claim of rebate/refund - Procedure of A.R.E.-1 followed instead ...

Central Excise

July 10, 2016

Claim of rebate/refund - Procedure of A.R.E.-1 followed instead of A.R.E-2 as contended by the department - There is no independent evidences on record to show that the applicant have exported the goods without payment of duty under ARE-2 or under Bond. Under such circumstances, Government finds force in contention of applicant that they have by mistake ticked in ARE-I form declaration - matter remanded back for verification - CGOVT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Claim of rebate/refund - Procedure of A.R.E.-1 followed instead ...

Central Excise

July 10, 2016

You may also like:

Denial of rebate claim - applicant cleared the goods by following self sealing procedure, and good were not physically examined at the port of export - rebate cannot be...

Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted from the GSTN to DG Systems - CBIC prescribed the procedure to be followed.

Claim of rebate / Refund in cash - rebate claim sanctioned by way of credit to Cenvat account - Export of Services - Cash refund allowed - AT

Adjustment of refund with interest due on belated duty - adjustment of sanctioned rebate claims against the interest amount, which never stand adjudicated by the...

Denial of refund claim of Rebate of duty - Mere pendency of revision before the C.G. at the instance of the department, is of no consequence - HC

Amendment in Policy condition No. 2 (iii) to Chapter 95 of ITC(HS), 2017-Schedule 1 (Import Policy) – Procedure to be followed for clearance of toys

Once the department was aware of the procedure followed by the appellant for taking the CENVAT credit subsequently the department cannot allege suppression with...

Rebate claim – refund claim was time barred - rebate claim was rightly rejected as time barred but the re-credit of duty paid in Cenvat account is not admissible - CGOVT

Interest on refund of retention of rebate claim - Earlier recovery of interest made from the Rebate claim on exports - The appellant is entitled to interest @ 12% P.A. - AT

Rebate claims - export of goods - defect in the original application - Bar of limitation - neither Rule 18 nor notification of GOI prescribe any procedure for claiming...

Quick Updates: