Penalty u/s 271D - violation of the provisions of section 269SS ...

High Court rules no penalty u/s 271D for reclassified Rs. 40,00,000 transaction as capital contribution by AOP member.

August 17, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of the provisions of section 269SS or not - treating the deposit/loan of ₹ 40,00,000/- as capital contribution of the member of AOP, for the AOP - transactions are genuine - no penalty - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of the provisions of section 269SS ...

High Court rules no penalty u/s 271D for reclassified Rs. 40,00,000 transaction as capital contribution by AOP member.

August 17, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The AT found evidence of hawala transactions through a recovered notebook containing daily business accounts, despite the appellant's retraction. The tribunal...

Imported goods classification disputed - whether silver jewellery freely importable or restricted category under ITC (HS) Code 71069210. Court found respondent's...

Appellant failed to submit required documents within stipulated time for provisional duty assessment, contravening Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations,...

The HC allowed the petition and quashed the order rejecting the petitioner's refund claim of Rs. 40,00,000 deposited voluntarily by mistake. The HC held that the amount...

The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

The AT set aside penalties of Rs.4,00,000/- and Rs.6,00,000/- imposed on the appellant under FEMA. Despite allegations that the appellant assisted in preparing forged...

HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order and notice u/s 148A(b). AO failed to establish that petitioner had received any amount exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/-...

CESTAT upheld reclassification of imported high conductivity copper bus bars from CTI 7407 21 20 to CTI 7407 10 30, resulting in denial of FTA benefits under N/N....

The CESTAT upheld the duty demand, confiscation of imported goods for non-fulfilment of export obligation u/s 111(o), imposition of redemption fine u/s 125, and...

The CESTAT held that the imported betel nuts were rightly classified under CTH 0802 8030. While the minimum import price fixed by DGFT could not be treated as tariff...

HC addressed valuation dispute regarding exported Printed Circuit Boards where penalty was significantly increased from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in subsequent...

Applicability of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) provisions to a non-resident bank and its CEO. The bank was charged with contravening sections 64(2), 6(4),...

The Appellate Tribunal held that for determining the holding period of a property or calculating long-term capital gains, the date of allotment of the property is...

The High Court considered a case involving the release of seized goods u/s 110A. The issue was the non-issuance of a show cause notice within the stipulated time due to...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) and u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abetment in undervaluation - evasion of Customs Duty by several syndicates of crane...

Quick Updates: